ISO TC 215 - ISO TS 13582: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(→Data types) |
|||
(24 dazwischenliegende Versionen desselben Benutzers werden nicht angezeigt) | |||
Zeile 25: | Zeile 25: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | {{:ISO13582-part1}} | |
− | + | {{:ISO13582-part2}} | |
− | + | {{:ISO13582-part3}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | {{ | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | }} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | {{ | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | }} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
=Bibliography= | =Bibliography= | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Aktuelle Version vom 17. Februar 2012, 18:33 Uhr
International Organization for Standardization TC 215 Health Informatics |
Sharing of OID registry information in healthcare
Extracted from
http://wiki.hl7.de/index.php/ISO_TC_215_-_ISO_TS_13582
Version: | as of 2011-05-15 |
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1 History of Titles
- 2 Stage
- 3 Legenda
- 4 Scope
- 5 Normative References
- 6 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms
- 6.1 Terms and definitions
- 7 Object Identifiers in healthcare
- 8 Approach
- 9 Information model
- 10 List of Codes and Enumerations
- 11 Data types
- 11.1 Address AD
- 11.2 Coded Simple Value CS
- 11.3 Encapsulated Data ED
- 11.4 Entity Name for a person EN.PN
- 11.5 Entity Name for an organization EN.ON
- 11.6 Interval of time stamp IVL_TS
- 11.7 String ST
- 11.8 String ST.NT
- 11.9 Object Identifier (dot notation) ST.OID
- 11.10 Object Identifier (asn1 notation) ST.ASN1
- 11.11 Object Identifier (iri notation) ST.IRI
- 11.12 Symbolic name ST.SYMB
- 11.13 Telecommunication TEL
- 11.14 Locatable Resource TEL.URL
- 11.15 Time stamp TS
- 12 Annex A (informative)
- 13 Annex B (informative)
- 14 Annex C (informative): W3C schema for the XML representation
- 15 Bibliography
History of Titles
- ISO/TC 215/WG 3 NWI Proposal 680, TS "Health Informatics - Communication model and XMLInterface Specification for OID Registries (ComoXOID)", 2008.
- ISO 13582 - Health informatics - Communication and metadata model and XML-interface specification for OID registries in healthcare - Technical Specification. 2010
- ISO 13582 - Health informatics - Sharing of OID registry information - Technical Specification. 2010
Stage
20 preparatory, approved for registration as DIS
Legenda
In this specification the follwing symbols are used.
A note. |
A point of discussion. |
A constraint/conformance statement. |
Something that still needs to be worked out. |
Scope
This International Standard specifies the mandatory and optional information to be recorded in any registry of OIDs, using an information model.
It specifies what parts of that information shall be regarded as public, and what parts shall be subject to security and privacy requirements.
In detail, this International Standard:
- specifies an information model and a corresponding XML format for the export of the contents of an OID registry, suitable e.g. for import to a different OID registry
- references common uses cases for OID registries/repositories
- references an Object Identifier Resolution System (ORS) which provides a look-up mechanism for information related to an object identifier, with guidance on the use of that facility.
Normative References
The following normative documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this ISO 13582. For dated references, subsequent amendments to, or revisions of, any of these publications do not apply. However, parties to agreements based on this ISO 13582 are encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the normative documents indicated below. For undated references, the latest edition of the normative document referred to applies. Members of ISO and IEC maintain registers of currently valid International Standards.
- ISO/IEC 8601:2004, Data elements and interchange formats -- Information interchange -- Representation of dates and times
- ISO/IEC 8824:1990(E), Information technology -- Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation
- ISO/IEC 21090:2011, Health Informatics — Harmonizied datatypes for information interchange
- ISO/IEC 22220, Health informatics — Identification of subjects of health care
- IETF RFC 1738 - Uniform Resource Locators (URL)
- IETF RFC 2396 - Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax
- IETF RFC 2806 - URLs for Telephone Calls
- IETF RFC 2978 - IANA Charset Registration Procedures
- IETF RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages
- HL7 V3- Data Types - Abstract Specification (R2)
Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms
Terms and definitions
OID registry and OID repository
An OID registry maintains a list of OIDs.
Typically additional information (metadata, such as responsible organizations, a human readable name, a description of the object, and other information that is needed for any meaningful use of the object identified) associated with the OID is stored also. With that, a registry is then a repository at the same time.
Maintaining the list (and associated metadata) happens regardless whether it is an official register for allocations of new OIDs under a given OID arc, or just a copy of information from other registries.
Official OID registries/repositories responsible for allocations of new OIDs under a given OID arc are Registration Authorities.
Registration Authority (RA)
A Registration Authority (RA) is responsible for allocating child arcs to the OID that it manages (issuing authority).
It ensures that an integer is used once among the subsequent arcs (child OIDs). As much as possible, it avoids the same identifier (beginning with a lowercase letter) being used for multiple sub-arcs.
Such information is typically stored in the OID registry/repository but it is important to understand that an OID first need to be officially allocated by an RA before it can be described in an OID repository.
For each child OID, the RA also keeps a record of additional information (like name of a contact person, postal address, telephone and fax numbers, email address, etc.) about the Responsible Authority for that child OID.
A responsible authority for a child OID is formally becoming a RA for that child OID, as it may allocate sub-arcs.
Responsible (Managing) Authority (MA)
A Responsible (Managing) Authority (MA) is used to indicate the person (if known) and organization who is currently in charge of managing the OID.
Once a responsible authority is allocating sub-arcs and registering information on these sub-arcs, it also becomes the Registration Authority for these sub-arcs.
Submitting Authority (SA)
This information is optional and reflects the person or organization that submitted the original OID allocation request.
Relationship to and discussion of definitions from other sources
Current Registrant
In some OID registries, Current Registrants are stored. The definitions from other sources say that the Current Registrant is used to indicate the person (if known) who is currently in charge of managing the OID, allocating sub-arcs and registering information on these sub-arcs.
Discussion: simply managing an OID (for example for a code system) is a Responsible Authority MA. Potentially, a responsible authority may become a Registration Authority RA for a sub-arc if it allocates sub-arcs.
First Registrant
In some OID registries, First Registrants are stored. The definitions from other sources say that the First Registrant is used to indicate the very first person (if known) who was responsible to manage the OID and who created it in the first instance.
Discussion: Suggestion is to distinguish between a Registration Authority RA (person if known, and organization) who issued (= allocated the instance of) an OID and a Submitting Authority SA who submitted the OID allocation request (which may be the same instance). In this sense the First Registrant is the Registration Authority RA.
Note: Due to a comment from the Canadian ISO representatives Registration Authority even could be renamed to Issuing Authority.
First Registration Authority
The first Registration Authority of an OID is the very first person or company to whom the OID was allocated by the RA of the superior OID. According to Rec. ITU-T X.660 | ISO/IEC 9834-1, the first RA can't be changed (if the responsibility is transferred to someone else, the information is recorded in the "Current Registration Authority" section, without changing the "First Registration Authority" section).
Discussion: This is the Registration Authority RA that allocated the OID.
Rec. ITU-T X.660 | ISO/IEC 9834-1
In ITU-T Recommendation X.660 the following definitions are given.
- 3.6.8 registration authority: An entity such as an organization, a standard or an automated facility that performs registration of one or more types of objects (see also International Registration Authority).
- 3.6.2 administrative role (of a registration authority): Assigning and making available unambiguous names according to the Recommendation | International Standard defining the procedures for the authority.
- 3.6.14 technical role (of a registration authority): Recording definitions of the objects to which names are assigned and verifying that these definitions are in accordance with the Recommendation | International Standard defining the form of the definition.
This Technical Standard does not use administrative or technical roles.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used for the terms defined in this International Standard and its annexes.
HL7 Health Level Seven Inc
IETF Internet Engineering Task Force
OID Object Identifier
OMG Object Management Group
W3C World Wide Web Consortium
XML Extensible Markup Language
Legenda of Tables and Symbols
Class Attribute and Association Tables
The Class Attribute Tables (information model) make use of the following table headline:
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|
where
DT = datatype conformant to the ISO 21090 datatypes,
Card = cardinality, e.g. 0..1 or 1..* etc.
Conf = conformance, either
- mandatory which means that the information SHALL be present in every instance of an extract of an OID registry/repository, or
- required which means that the information SHOULD be provided if there are no privacy reasons for masking that information, or
- optional when information is optional.
Length = recommended length (as an implementation hint e.g. for data base string lengths etc).
In addition, the Association Tables (information model) make use of the following table headline:
Association | Description | Class | Card | Conf |
---|
where
Association = the association name to the associated class
Class = the associated class name
Object Identifiers in healthcare
OID (Object Identifiers) are unique identifiers for any kind of objects. They are defined in Rec. ITU-T X.660 | ISO/IEC 9834-1[1] [2]. This identification system for objects and concepts makes reliable electronic information exchange possible. Administration and Registration is regulated by a set of rules (see also ISO/NWIP/TR "Health Informatics – Guidance for maintenance of Object Identifiers OID"[3]).
The precise designation of objects and concepts is a pre-requisite for the standardized exchange of information. A globally unique identifier for each of these concepts will help to ensure international exchangeability of objects within different applications (e.g. healthcare information systems). For example, OIDs are often used within HL7 messages and documents, and Rec. ITU-T X.509 certificates to provide this unique identification.
In the exchange of healthcare information, especially between loosely coupled systems, additional information about the object being identified is generally very beneficial; this is information that is typically not contained in a transaction of data between systems but is reference information about the objects contained in the transaction. There is a minimal set of such information, such as Responsible Organizations, a human readable name, a description of the object, and other such information that is needed for any meaningful use of the objects identified. Since such information may not be locally available to a system examining the communicated objects, it makes sense to have such information available in a standardized form, and accessed by using the OID to identify this information. Such information, referred to as the OID metadata, is the bulk of the information housed in an OID Registry.
Today, due to lack of standardization of the set of metadata (both content and structure), existing OID registries are not compatible. Contents, attributes and rules of the assignment of OIDs of existing registries are incompatible and often dissimilar. Many registries still distribute OIDs in a form only suitable for direct text processing (like spreadsheets) that is error prone and hard to automate. There is a need to store and transfer collections of OIDs and also to keep some registries completely in sync, maintaining the contents and the structure of metadata of each of the registered OIDs e.g. descriptions, comments, versions, links, relations, responsible organizations and persons, etc.
Data exchange can be facilitated by a standardized representation of a required minimum set of metadata as an XML structure together with the associated checks of underlying constraints and business rules. This XML structure for importing and exporting OIDs amongst different registries should be achieved for supporting eHealth applications. In addition, the failure to have a standard for the operations needed to coordinated and synchronize the contents of disparate OID registries leads to confusion and ambiguity for the community that uses eHealth information containing references to objects identified by OIDs.
There are currently at least hundreds of OID registries in active use throughout the world. These are sponsored and operated by disparate entities, ranging from national governments, to individual companies or standards organizations, to individuals in a specialized area or industry. In many cases, more than one of these registries address the same industry segment, and have overlapping content, i.e. specific OIDs exist in both, or worse, different OIDs identifying the same object exist in both. This distributed set of disparate registries servicing a particular industry (specifically Healthcare IT) has led to awkward and error prone searching processes. To get information about existing OIDs, a search within all existing registries is needed, for example to avoid duplicate assignment of multiple OIDs to one and the same concept. In order to standardize the activities to synchronise all existing OID registries and to ensure further interoperability it is essential to have a defined exchange format and business rules for maintenance of the OID registries that must cooperate in a particular industry.
Some OID registries are operated by essentially volunteer organizations, such as Standards Bodies. The burden of administrative tasks is such that multiple individuals, often in different geographical locations, must participate to share the workload. Thus in addition to distributed Registry instances, administrative functions need to also be distributed, both on single and potentially across multiple Registries. There is a need for the standardization of a minimum set of administrative access and operational functions such that developers of Registries can deploy standard mechanisms to streamline and increase accuracy and productivity of these maintenance operations.
This Technical Standard describes a generic exchange format that will cover the minimal set of metadata and associated rules for OIDs of existing registries. It specifies principles and processes that should be explored/implemented by developers and data administrators of OID registries and their applicant bodies. The primary target group for this document are those establishing OID registries and those (industry, government bodies) using the services maintained by such organizations.
Additional descriptions
A general description of the registration procedures for various parts of the object identifier tree, by reference to other specifications and links to other documents is given in ISO 13581 - Health informatics - Guidance for maintenance of object identifiers, OID - Technical Report.
In informative Annex A, a description possible of sub trees reflecting OID categories for e-health related OIDs is given.
Informative Annex B specifies an Object Identifier Resolution System (ORS) for e-health related OIDs based on RESTful Web Services.
Informative Annex C references a W3C schema for the XML representation.
Related work
This work is related to discussions about OID in the work programme of TC 215 WG3, HL7, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6, ITU-T SG 17 and other organizations dealing with OIDs and OID registries.
Approach
Requirement analysis
Following an extensive analysis of the currently available international OID register for health care systems, a basic data set and a corresponding XML representation as an exchange format need to be created for registering and exchanging OID-related data. To collect the very basic requirements to such a format an analysis of several registers (e.g. HL7 International[4] register and several European registers[5][6] was performed so far in 2009 (see Table 1). The analysis included the contents, attributes and even the rules of the assignment of OID.
DIMDI | France Telecom-Orange OID repository | HL7 INTERNATIONAL |
---|---|---|
DESCRIPTIONENGLISH | DESCRIPTION, INFORMATION | OBJECT_DESCRIPTION |
DESCRIPTIONGERMAN | ||
ASN1NOTATION | ASN1-NOTATION | COMP_OID |
MODIFICATIONDATE | MODIFICATION-DATE | |
CREATIONDATE | CREATION-DATE | DATE_FINALIZED |
APPLICATIONDATE | ||
TYPE | OID_TYPE | |
FAMILY | LAST-NAME | NAME |
GIVEN | FIRST-NAME | NAME |
Only a few of the registers specified an (XML-) exchange format. Due to lack of a common understanding of OID registry requirements, data fields must be mapped (manually) when OID information needed to be exchanged.
Preparatory work
This technical standard has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 215 "Health informatics" in collaboration with HL7 International, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 and ITU-T SG 17.
The draft of this document has had multiple public comment phases (started in April 2010) with the submission and reconciliation of about 80 comments and has undergone a proof-of-concept phase in OID registry/repository projects in several European countries.
Information model
In order to exchange OID and their metadata between different registries and applications the following additional data items beyond the OID itself need to be taken under consideration (see also [7] [8]):
- descriptions
- status information
- categorization
- time information
- comments
- versions
- links
- relationships to other OIDs and external sources
- registering and responsible organizations
- associated persons.
An information model with all classes, attributes and their properties aiming on a common understanding of the requirements of an OID registry has been created (Figure 1).
XML exchange format
Data exchange can be facilitated by a standardized representation of the complete set of information as an XML structure together with the associated checks of underlying constraints and business rules. This XML structure for importing and exporting OID amongst different registries and other healthcare applications is aiming on the availability of reliable information about OIDs.
The following sections summarise and explain classes and their attributes.
Registry
This is the basic information about the OID-Registry hosting the OIDs.
Attributes
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
validTime | validity time interval | IVL_TS | 1..* | mandatory | - |
scopedOIDs | List of scoped root OIDs | ST.OID | 0..* | optional | 64 |
name | Official name of the OID registry | ST | 1..1 | mandatory | 64 |
description | Description of the OID registry, possible in multiple languages | ED | 0..* | optional | - |
validTime
This is the validity time interval, i.e. the begin (and end) time when this registry is/was responsible for registering OIDs. This can be a list of intervals.
rg-vt: A validTime element shall be present and of datatype IVL_TS with at least the low child element populated. |
scopedOIDs
List of scoped root OIDs, i.e. the OIDs for which this OID registry is responsible for registration.
rg-so: If the OID registry is responsible for issuing/registering a root OID, this OID should be listed in scopedOIDs. |
name
Official name of the OID registry
description
A description of the OID registry, possible in multiple languages
rg-ds: If at least one description element is present one of the description's language code shall be English (“en”, “en-US” etc.). |
Associations
Association | Description | Class | Card | Conf |
---|---|---|---|---|
person | Contact person(s) | Person | 1..* | mandatory |
hostingOrganization | Hosting organization | Organization | 1..* | mandatory |
oid | List of OIDs | Oid | 0..* | required |
Example
<registry>
<validTime>
<low value="20100501"/>
</validTime>
<scopedOID value="1.2.3.4.5"/>
<name value="The best OID registry ever"/>
<description language="en-US" value="This is a test OID registry, although the best"/>
<person> ... </person>
<hostingOrganization> ... </hostingOrganization>
<oid> ... </oid>
</registry>
Oid
This class contains the registered OID and the associated meta data.
Attributes
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dotNotation | registered OID, dot notation | ST.OID | 1..1 | mandatory | 64 |
asn1Notation | ASN.1 notation | ST.ASN1 | 0..1 | optional | 128 |
iriNotation | IRI notation | ST.IRI | 0..1 | optional | 128 |
symbolicName | symbolic name | ST.SYMB | 0..1 | optional | 128 |
category | OID category | CS | 1..1 | required | - |
status | OID status | CS | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
creationDate | date of creation | TS | 0..1 | optional | - |
realm | countries | CS | 0..* | optional | - |
description | textual description | ED | 1..* | mandatory | - |
dotNotation
The OID in dot notation of SNMP or ASN.1/XER.
Example:
2.16.528
asn1Notation
The OID in ASN.1 notation with (optional) identifiers and numbers.
Examples:
{joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) nl(528)}
{itu-t(0) recommendation(0) a(1)}
Note that the surrounding curly brackets can be omitted. |
Note that this information is not necessarily entered by a human, this item maybe populated algorithmically. |
iriNotation
The OID in Internationalized Resource Identifier[9] (IRI) notation.
Example:
oid:/Country/528
Note that this information is not necessarily entered by a human, this item maybe populated algorithmically. |
symbolicName / Secondary Arc Identifier
A symbolic short name, unique among the siblings of the arc of the OID.
The ISO rules on Secondary Arc Identifiers, as laid out in Rec. ITU-T | ISO/IEC 9834-1 Procedures for Registration Authorities, section 6.2.2, apply:
- identifiers of an arc are required to commence with a lowercase letter, and to contain only letters, digits, and hyphens.
- the last characters shall not be a hyphen
- there shall be no two consecutive hyphens in the name
Example
nl
category
The type/category of the OID; enumeration, values see value set OIDcategories.
There are actually two main types of OIDs: leafs (id of an object), and nodes representing an ontological branch.
The types of node OID may be
- a registration authority (RA) or
- a structure for the management of OIDs.
The proposal for sub categories of leaf OIDs are
- identifiers of an instance of an object (for example a person)
- namespace identifiers (for example code systems, value sets)
In addition there are properties of OIDs that can reflect other business needs.
These can be
|
status
Status of the OID. This is an enumeration, for values see value set OIDstatusCodes
creationDate
The creationDate is used to describe when the OID was first registered. It is not the date when the OID description is submitted to the OID repository. The creationDate, once set, never changes.
realm
In some cases OIDs may apply to a specific county/realm only, e.g. the namespace identifiers for the US Social Security Number (SSN) or the Dutch Citizen Service Number (BSN) or the codes system representing ICD-10 International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision for the use in Germany only (ICD10gm). This can be indicated by realm which is either the code of country or "UV" for universal. For values see code system CountryCodes.
description
This element contains a free text description of the OID ("what is the OID?"). The text typically contains an explanation but also can contain:
- explicit versioning aspects
- licensing information
- Intellectual Property rights information
- trademarks.
This element is repeatable for each language.
The datatype ED allows for a thumbnail child element. A thumbnail may be populated describing a short description of the OID (sometimes referred to as identifier name).
Example:
<description language="en-US" value="this is plain text as a long description">
<thumbnail value="short text"/>
</description>
Note that data type ED also reflects the aspect of language of the description (language code). |
oi-ds: There SHALL be one description instance with language code English (“en”, “en-US” etc.). |
Associations
Association | Description | Class | Card | Conf |
---|---|---|---|---|
registrationAuthority | Registration Authority | RegistrationAuthority | 1..1 | required |
responsibleAuthority | Responsible Authority | ResponsibleAuthority | 1..* | required |
submittingAuthority | Submitting Authority | SubmittingAuthority | 0..1 | optional |
additionalProperty | Additional Properties | AdditionalProperty | 0..* | optional |
historyAnnotation | History Annotations | HistoryAnnotation | 0..* | optional |
reference | References | Reference | 0..* | optional |
RegistrationAuthority
This class represents the Registration Authority (RA).
Attributes
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
code | RA role code | CS | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
code
The code holds information about the role type of the RA. Valid codes are listed in RoleCodes.
Associations
Association | Description | Class | Card | Conf |
---|---|---|---|---|
scopingOrganization | Scoping organization | Organization | 1..1 | mandatory |
person | Contact person(s) | Person | 0..1 | optional |
ResponsibleAuthority
This is a class representing the (managing) authority that is responsible for the object that is identified by the OID (not for the OID itself).
Attributes
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
code | role code | CS | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
statusCode | status code | CS | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
validTime | validity time | IVL_TS | 1..* | mandatory | - |
code
The code holds information about the role type of the ResponsibleAuthority. Valid codes are listed in RoleCodes.
statusCode
The statusCode holds information about the status of the ResponsibleAuthority. Valid codes are listed in RoleStatus.
validTime
This is an interval of time, representing the period when the ResponsibleAuthority is/was responsible for the object that is identified by the OID. If the ResponsibleAuthority is still responsible, only validTime.low is populated.
Associations
Association | Description | Class | Card | Conf |
---|---|---|---|---|
scopingOrganization | Scoping organization | Organization | 1..1 | mandatory |
person | Contact person(s) | Person | 0..1 | optional |
SubmittingAuthority
This is a class representing the submitting authority that originally asked for a new OID.
(Please note: to avoid redundancy, the classes Organization and Peron are shown with attributes here, at all other places only a "shadow" class of these two classes is shown)
Attributes
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
code | role code | CS | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
applicationDate | date of application | TS | 0..1 | optional | - |
code
The code holds information about the role type of the submitting authority. Valid codes are listed in RoleCodes.
applicationDate
Date of application (submission or certified submission) of the requested OID.
Associations
Association | Description | Class | Card | Conf |
---|---|---|---|---|
scopingOrganization | Scoping organization | Organization | 1..1 | mandatory |
person | Contact person(s) | Person | 1..1 | mandatory |
HistoryAnnotation
This class reflects historical annotations of the OID and records the changes of any data over time.
Attributes
Attribute | Description | Datatype | Cardinality | Conformance | Recommended Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
annotationDate | date annotation was created | TS | 0..1 | required | - |
text | annotation | ED | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
Note that data type ED also reflects the aspect of language of the description (language code). |
Reference
This class provides a link to
- other data sources, code tables, value sets, descriptions etc; typically this is a URL and always points to an object with different semantics than the OID itself.
- other OIDs (within or outside this OID registry) in order to be able to express that an OID has been superseded/replaced or that there is a preferred OID.
Attributes
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ref | reference URI | URI | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
type | type of reference | CS | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
lastVisitedDate | date URI last visited | TS | 0..1 | optional | - |
ref
The referenced URI.
type
The nature of the reference is coded in the type attribute, for vocabulary see ReferenceType.
lastVisitedDate
Specifies the date the UIR was last visited.
AdditionalProperty
This class reflects additional properties of an OID that might be used to fit business rules that cannot (or should not) be standardized. This includes:
- additional categories
- additional status information
- tags, simple text
- coded properties
It is made of
- attribute, describing the type of the additional property
- value, the value of the additional property.
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
attribute | Additional property type | ST.NT | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
value | Additional property value | ST.NT | 1..1 | mandatory | - |
Person
A class to hold the properties of a person.
Attributes
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
name | person's name | EN.PN | 1..* | mandatory | - |
addr | person's address | AD | 0..* | optional | - |
telecom | person's telecommunication contact | TEL | 0..* | optional | - |
Organization
A class to hold the properties of an organization.
Attributes
Attribute | Description | DT | Card | Conf | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
id | id (OID) of the organization | ST.OID | 0..* | optional | - |
name | name of the organization | EN.ON | 1..* | mandatory | - |
addr | address of the organization | AD | 0..* | optional | - |
telecom | telecommunication contact of the organization | TEL | 0..* | optional | - |
List of Codes and Enumerations
CountryCodes
ISO 3166-1 alpha two letter country codes are used[10][11]. This list states the country names as given in ISO 3166-1 and the corresponding ISO 3166-1-alpha-2 code elements.
LanguageCodes
Reflects the Human Language. Language is specified conformant to RFC 3066 (Tags for the Identification of Languages). The format is
ss[-CC]
where ss is the language code drawn from ISO-639-1[12], and CC is the country code, conformant to ISO-3166 alpha-2.
Example:
en-US
OIDcategories
This enumeration reflects the category of the OID (node, leaf) and possible sub categories.
Level | Code | Description |
---|---|---|
0 | N | node |
1 | NRA | registration authority (RA) |
1 | NMN | structure for the management of OIDs (it is not good practice but we know that some of these nodes in some registries also identify objects, which should not be) |
0 | L | leaf |
1 | LIO | an instance of an object |
1 | LNS | a namespace identifier |
OIDstatusCodes
This code reflects the status of the OID. Valid values are:
Level | Code | Description |
---|---|---|
0 | pending | OID assignment pending |
0 | complete | assignment complete |
0 | retired | OID retired/withdrawn |
0 | unknown | status of the OID unknown |
ReferenceType
The type of reference covers the following values:
Level | Code | Description |
---|---|---|
0 | RPLC | replaced by OID |
0 | PREF | preferred OID |
0 | LINK | link access (to code and value set tables) |
0 | IDSD | identification scheme documentation |
RoleCodes
This covers the kind of role of an authority. Valid values are:
Level | Code | Description |
---|---|---|
0 | PRI | primary |
0 | SEC | secondary |
0 | OBO | on behalf of |
0 | CON | contact person |
RoleStatus
This covers the status of role:
Level | Code | Description |
---|---|---|
0 | active | active |
0 | terminated | terminated |
Data types
A subset of the ISO 21090 data types[13] is used for the XML representation of data. In some cases additional flavors or constraints are defined.
The following section gives examples and describes the restrictions / constraints on the generic specification.
Address AD
Example:
<addr use="HP">
<part type="STR" value="Windsteiner Weg"/>
<part type="BNR" value="54a"/>
<part type="CNT" code="DEU" codeSystem=" 1.0.3166.1.2" value="D"/>
<part type="ZIP" value="14165"/>
<part type="CTY" value="Berlin"/>
</addr>
Coded Simple Value CS
A coded attribute with a simple value. The attribute is always bound to a specific code system mentioned in the section about lists of code systems and enumerations .
Example:
<statusCode code="active"/>
Encapsulated Data ED
In this specification this is either plain text (media type "text/plain") and HTML (media type "text/html") only. A language code is required.
ed-lc: An element of data type ED SHALL have a language code represented in @language. |
ed-mt: An element of data type ED SHALL have a @mediaType of "text/plain" or "text/html". |
Examples:
<text value="this is plain text" language="en-US" mediaType="text/plain"/>
<text value="dieses ist normaler Text" language="de-DE" mediaType="text/plain"/>
Entity Name for a person EN.PN
Example:
<name use="OR C">
<part type="GIV" value="Selby"/>
<part type="FAM" qualifier="SP" value="Butt"/>
<part type="FAM" value="Hadrian"/>
</name>
Entity Name for an organization EN.ON
Example:
<name use="LS">
<part value="Healthy Hospital"/>
<part qualifier="SFX">LLC</part>
</name>
Interval of time stamp IVL_TS
Example:
<validTime>
<low value="20101201"/>
<high value="20101224"/>
</validTime>
String ST
A character string, with possible translations.
Example:
<name value="I am a name"/>
String ST.NT
A character string, with no translations allowed.
Object Identifier (dot notation) ST.OID
This is actually a character string without translation (ST.NT) with a certain pattern. The pattern can be found in the Schema for XML representation (see Annex C).
Example:
<oid value="1.2.3.4.5.0.6.7.8.9"/>
Object Identifier (asn1 notation) ST.ASN1
This is actually a character string without translation (ST.NT) with a certain pattern. The pattern can be found in the Schema for XML representation (see Annex C).
Object Identifier (iri notation) ST.IRI
This is actually a character string without translation (ST.NT) with a certain pattern. The pattern can be found in the Schema for XML representation (see Annex C).
Symbolic name ST.SYMB
This is actually a character string without translation (ST.NT) with a certain pattern. The pattern can be found in the Schema for XML representation (see Annex C).
Telecommunication TEL
Example:
<telecom value="tel:+491234567890" use="H WP" capabilities="voice fax"/>
Locatable Resource TEL.URL
This points to a locatable resource, e.g. an internet address (see also: [14][15]).
Example:
<ref value="http://x.y.org"/>
Time stamp TS
Example:
<applicationDate value="20101205"/>
Annex A (informative)
This informative annex includes a specification of those parts of the OID tree that are known to be used for national and for international e-health applications. A description of possible of sub trees reflecting OID types is given.
OID types
In many OID registries the type of an OID is used to improve for example the administrative process around assigning new OIDs or improve search capabilities of registry users etc.. The OID type has nothing to do with ISO standards, or any intrinsic meaning or form of the OID itself, it is only a convenience for the users of an OID registry.
In order to store OID types along with OID metadata described in this technical standard, class AdditionalProperty is used. It seemed from international experience with OID registries that this can be a recommendation only. OID types vary from registry to registry.
Therefore OID types may be used as additional properties; if OID type is used it is recommended that AdditionalProperty.attribute should be “OIDType” and AdditionalProperty.value shall be an enumeration or code string representing the OID type.
HL7 Viewpoint
HL7 International has created a type ontology for the OIDs in the HL7 registry to make it easier for the user community to search for OIDs they may be looking for.
The following types have been defined for use in the HL7 OID Registry [7]:
Arc | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
.1 | HL7 registered internal objects (other than organizational bodies) | Type 1 OIDs are used for certain internal administrative functions, and to identify released and published Standards. This includes Version 3 International Releases, Normative Editions, V2.x Standards releases, CDA releases, etc. This is almost never used at this time. |
.2 | HL7 organizational bodies and groups | Type 2 OIDs are only used to identify an HL7 Group, such as a Working Group, or an International Council Member of HL7, such as HL7 Australia. These are created only when a new organizational body is recognized by HL7 International Headquarters. |
.3 | External (not HL7) group functioning as a Registration Authority | Type 3 OIDs are used for organizations that wish to create their own trees of OIDs for their use. If you will be assigning OIDs yourself under the OID that you are applying for, then you should select Type 3. This effectively delegates Registration Authority to your organization for all OIDs under this new Type 3 OID. No one else anywhere will create OIDs under your new root. Every OID created ‘under’ this new root will be considered by HL7 to be an ‘external’ OID, since you will have created it external to the HL7 OID Registry OID assignment software. These may be requested or registered by anyone.
Note that a Type 3 OID identifies an organizational entity, not a particular piece of hardware machinery. It does not have to be a corporation, it could be as small as a single development group building interface software for an NHIN Connect project, for instance. Type 3 OIDs should not be used to identify objects in addition to the organizational entity responsible for creating new OIDs under it. |
.4 | Registered externally maintained identifier systems and namespaces | Type 4 OIDs are used for namespaces for identifiers that are public, and used widely, such as health card numbers, ID numbers assigned by jurisdictional authorities, etc. This is also used for any namespaces you may manage with your own defined OIDs under your own root, such as Medical Record Numbers or Accession Numbers, for example. This type of OID is typically used in the root of the version 3 datatype Instance Identifier. |
.5 | HL7 Internal Code Systems | Type 5 OIDs are used only for HL7 created and maintained Coding Systems, that have been approved through the HL7 V3 Harmonization process. This type is assigned only by the group that applies decisions from the harmonization processes to the HL7 databases. These OIDs are typically used in the codSystem property of an HL7 Version 3 coded datatype. |
.6 | Registered external coding systems | Type 6 is assigned to those OIDs that identify a Coding System or terminology that is created, published, and maintained by any organization outside of HL7. At this time, only an HL7 cochair or OID administrator can assign Type 6 to any OID. This type of OID is typically used in the codeSystem property of an HL7 Version 3 coded datatype. |
.7 | HL7 published document artifacts | Type 7 OIDs are used solely for HL7 published artifacts (not releases of Standards), and are assigned only by members of the HL7 publishing group. This includes tutorial slides, implementation guides, databases, published RIM graphic billboards, Wiki pages, etc. |
.8 | (deprecated) | Type 8 is currently not used. |
.9 | HL7 Registered conformance profiles | Type 9 is used to indicate HL7 Conformance Profiles, published in the HL7 Profile Registry. |
.10 | HL7 Registered Templates | Type 10 OIDs identify published Templates. These are created and registered by the Templates Workgroup, or by HL7 Workgroups that define and publish templates as part of their balloted standards. |
.11 | HL7 defined and registered Value Sets | Type 11 OIDs identify Value Sets that have been created and published by HL7, and have been approved through the HL7 Harmonization processes only. These are used in HL7 Version 3 Model Binding and Context Binding mechanisms, and can only be assigned by members of the group that applies the HL7 Harmonization process approvals to the HL7 databases. |
.12 | HL7 Version 2.x tables | Type 12 indicates that an OID identifies explicitly an HL7 Version 2.x Table, as published in the HL7 Version 2 series of standards. These exist to help facilitate development of translation capabilities between Version 2.x and Version 3/CDA interfaces. |
.13 | Externally authored and curated Value Sets | Type 13 OIDs identify Value Sets that have been created, published, and are maintained by organizations outside of HL7. They may be registered by anyone, and are generally used in Hl7 Version 3 Model Binding and Context Binding mechanisms. |
.14 | Assignment Ontology node | Type 14 OIDs may be used by any Registration Authority to indicate a structural ‘branch’ in the tree that they create under their own root, where the node is not any particular type of OID, the types will be below this node. Normally any node that is not a leaf is a registration authority, but some find that adding levels in the structure of the OIDs they create as Registration Authorities make the administration of the tree a bit easier. Each of the nodes in the HL7 tree that is the root of each of the Types is actually a Type 14 OID. |
.15 | Small code sets externally defined | Type 15 OIDs are used to identify small code lists or sets that are defined and maintained by organizations outside of HL7. Where Value Sets are built upon underlying coding systems, short code lists are often ad-hoc values that are used in various applications, that are not components of a particular terminology or coding system. This type of OID may be used in the codeSystem property of a version 3 coded datatype. |
.17 | Non-specified type | Type 17 OIDs are for any other type of object that does not fall into one of the other Type categories. |
.18 | HL7 Version 2.8 Coding Systems | Type 18 OIDs are specifically for those coding systems that are defined as such in the HL7 Version 2.8 standard. These may only be created by HL7 cochairs. |
.19 | HL7 Examples | Type 19 OIDs are used for published examples; it is a truly meaningless identifier, as it is not to be used for any actual entities. This is the only kind of OID that may not be a unique identifier, i.e. it may refer to more than one object if it appears in different publications or slides. Type 19 OIDs are used ONLY in published examples in documents and slide presentations, and should NEVER appear in any implementation or any HL7 model instance. |
Recommendations for OID types
From a policy perspective it is common practice in several healthcare related OID registries [16] [17] [18] to distinguish at least between the following types of OIDs:
Arc | Type |
---|---|
.3 | organizational bodies and groups |
.4 | identifier systems and namespaces |
.5 | code systems |
.7 | document artifacts |
.9 | conformance profiles |
.10 | templates |
.11 | value sets |
.19 | examples |
.99 | experimental |
Annex B (informative)
Informative Annex B specifies the list of use cases of an OID registry/repository and an Object Identifier Resolution System (ORS) for e-health related OIDs based on RESTful Web Services.
Use Cases
A list of OID Registry Use Cases has been defined in order to drive metadata model requirements, and functional requirements for Registry interoperability.
U1: OID Creation where the registry owner is the RA
- Creation of a new OID in the standard ontological structure
- Creation of a new OID in a sub-structure
U2: OID Registration
- Registration where the registry owner created the OID
- Registration of an OID created elsewhere
U3: OID Withdrawal/Replacement
- Withdraw an OID created in error with no replacement
- Withdraw an OID created in error with specified replacement
- Withdraw an OID registered in error with no replacement
- Withdraw an OID registered in error with specified replacement
- Withdraw an OID that is found to be a duplicate, with original specified
U4: OID Metadata Update/Editing
- Permissions model
- Distributed effort model
- Proxies for Editors
U5: OID Information Publication
- Web presence
- Internet-accessible API (Web service presence)
- Full registry output to machine-readable form
- Full registry output to human-readable form
- Partial registry output to machine-readable form
- Partial registry output to human-readable form
U6: OID Information Request
- Search for the OID of an object
- Search for the object identified by an OID
- Search for a list of kinds of OIDs
- Search for a list of OID based on various sub-criteria, with and without wildcards
- Those registered by a particular entity
- Those associated with a type of information object
- Those associated with implementation guides
- Those registered during some time period
- etc.
RESTful Web Servcies for an Object Identifier Resolution System
Representational state transfer (REST) is a style of software architecture for distributed hypermedia systems such as the World Wide Web. The term representational state transfer was introduced and defined in 2000 by Roy Fielding in his doctoral dissertation.
A RESTful web service is implemented using HTTP and the principles of REST. It is a collection of resources, with four defined aspects:
- the base URI for the web service, such as
http://oid.server.org/
- the Internet media type of the data supported by the web service, in this case either XML or HTML only.
- the set of operations supported by the web service using HTTP methods, in this case GET only.
This part of annex B recommends a simple mechanism to be provided in order to retrieve lists of OIDs from a registry, details of a particular OID or an extract of the entire OID registry. Various formats should be supported like HTML and the original XML format.
The suggested calls should be implemented as RESTful Web Services and their parameters are stated as follows.
REST ressource specification
Resource | Description GET | Parameters |
---|---|---|
OIDIndex | retrieves an index of all OIDs in the OID registry in HTML format |
id (optional): an OID language (optional): language format (default, fixed): html |
http://oid.server.org/OIDIndex gets an HTML table of all OIDs in the registry with links to the details for each OID http://oid.server.org/OIDIndex?id=1.0.3166.1.2.2 gets an HTML table of OID 1.0.3166.1.2.2 with links to the details for this OID http://oid.server.org/OIDIndex?id=1.0.3166.1.2.2&language=de-DE gets an HTML table of OID 1.0.3166.1.2.2 with links to the details for this OID in the German language | ||
RetrieveOID | retrieves a particular OID in the OID registry |
id (required): an OID format (optional): html or xml language (optional): language |
http://oid.server.org/RetrieveOID?id=1.0.3166.1.2.2&format=html gets details of OID 1.0.3166.1.2.2 in HTML format http://oid.server.org/RetrieveOID?id=1.0.3166.1.2.2&format=html&language=de-DE gets details of OID 1.0.3166.1.2.2 in HTML format in the German language http://oid.server.org/RetrieveOID?id=1.0.3166.1.2.2&format=xml gets details of OID 1.0.3166.1.2.2 in XML format | ||
GetOIDRegistry | gets the entire content of the OID registry in XML format |
format (default, fixed): xml |
http://oid.server.org/GetOIDRegistry gets the entire content of the OID registry in XML format |
Annex C (informative): W3C schema for the XML representation
Annex C (informative) refers a W3C Schema with embedded ISO schematron (ISO/IEC 19757-3) for the XML representation of the structures described in this technical standard.
The W3C schema can (temporarily) be found at http://oidregistry.info/schema.
Bibliography
- ↑ ITU-T X.660 | ISO/IEC 9834-1
- ↑ ISO/IEC DIS 9834-1 Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection -- Procedures for the operation of OSI Registration Authorities: General procedures and top arcs of the International Object Identifier tree
- ↑ ISO/NWIP/TR Health Informatics – Guidance for maintenance of Object Identifiers OID
- ↑ HL7 International
- ↑ OID repository (France Telecom-Orange)
- ↑ OID registry (DIMDI, Germany)
- ↑ Recommendation ITU-T X.680 (2008) | ISO/IEC 8824-1: 2008, Information Technology – Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1), Specification of Basic Notation, 1997
- ↑ Recommendation ITU-T X.667 | ISO/IEC 9834-8: Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Procedures for the operation of OSI Registration Authorities: Generation and registration of Universally Unique Identifiers (UUIDs) and their use as ASN.1 object identifier components
- ↑ http://www.oid-info.com/faq.htm#iri
- ↑ ISO 3166-1-alpha-2 country codes
- ↑ ISO 3166 - Codes for the representation of names of countries - The International Organization for Standardization, 3rd edition.
- ↑ ISO 639-2 Codes for the Representation of Names of Languages
- ↑ ISO/FDIS 21090:2010 Health Informatics - Harmonized data types for information interchange
- ↑ IETF RFC 1738 - Uniform Resource Locators (URL)
- ↑ IETF RFC 2396 - Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax
- ↑ http://www.dimdi.de/dynamic/de/ehealth/oid/verzeichnis.html OID registry Germany
- ↑ http://oid.refdata.ch/ OID registry Switzerland
- ↑ https://www.gesundheit.gv.at/OID_Frontend/ OID registry Austria