2.16.840.1.113883.5.1002/static-2012-07-24: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Hl7wiki
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
(Automated TermBot page content)
 
(Automated TermBot page content)
 
(6 dazwischenliegende Versionen desselben Benutzers werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 17: Zeile 17:
 
| bgcolor="#ECE9E4" colspan="2"|'''Beschreibung'''
 
| bgcolor="#ECE9E4" colspan="2"|'''Beschreibung'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
               
 
                Description: A directed association between a source Act and a target Act. Usage Note: This code should never be
 
                    transmitted in an instance as the value of ActRelationship.typeCode (attribute)
 
           
 
               
 
                A collection of sub-services as steps or subtasks performed for the source service. Services may be performed sequentially or
 
                    concurrently.
 
           
 
               
 
                The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source
 
                    Act entered into the source Act by means of the target Transportation act.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship from an Act to a Control Variable. For example, if a Device makes an Observation, this relates the
 
                    Observation to its Control Variables documenting the device's settings that influenced the observation.
 
           
 
               
 
                The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source
 
                    Act departed from the source Act by means of the target Transportation act.
 
           
 
               
 
                An observation that should follow or does actually follow as a result or consequence of a condition or action (sometimes called
 
                    "post-conditional".) Target must be an observation as a goal, risk or any criterion. For complex outcomes a conjunction attribute (AND, OR, XOR) can be used. An outcome link is
 
                    often inverted to describe an outcome assessment.
 
           
 
               
 
                A goal that one defines given a patient's health condition. Subsequently planned actions aim to meet that goal. Source is an
 
                    observation or condition node, target must be an observation in goal mood.
 
           
 
               
 
                A noteworthy undesired outcome of a patient's condition that is either likely enough to become an issue or is less likely but
 
                    dangerous enough to be addressed.
 
           
 
               
 
                The target act is a desired outcome of the source act. Source is any act (typically an intervention). Target must
 
                    be an observation in criterion mood.
 
           
 
               
 
                A desired state that a service action aims to maintain. E.g., keep systolic blood pressure between 90 and 110 mm
 
                    Hg. Source is an intervention service. Target must be an observation in criterion mood.
 
           
 
               
 
                A desired outcome that a service action aims to meet finally. Source is any service (typically an intervention). Target
 
                    must be an observation in criterion mood.
 
           
 
               
 
                This is a very unspecific relationship from one item of clinical information to another. It does not judge about
 
                    the role the pertinent information plays.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the target act authorizes or certifies the source act.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: An assertion that an act was the cause of another act.This is stronger and more specific than the support
 
                    link. The source (cause) is typically an observation, but may be any act, while the target may be any act. Examples: a growth of Staphylococcus aureus may be considered the cause
 
                    of an abscess contamination of the infusion bag was deemed to be the cause of the infection that the patient experienced lack of staff on the shift was deemed to be a supporting
 
                    factor (proximal factor) causing the patient safety incident where the patient fell out of bed because the bed-sides had not been put up which caused the night patient to fall out
 
                    of bed
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act is covered by or is under the authority of a target act. A financial instrument such as
 
                    an Invoice Element is covered by one or more specific instances of an Insurance Policy.
 
           
 
               
 
                Associates a derived Act with its input parameters. E.G., an anion-gap observation can be associated as being derived from
 
                    given sodium-, (potassium-,), chloride-, and bicarbonate-observations. The narrative content (Act.text) of a source act is wholly machine-derived from the collection of target
 
                    acts.
 
           
 
               
 
                Expresses an association that links two instances of the same act over time, indicating that the instance are part of the same
 
                    episode, e.g. linking two condition nodes for episode of illness; linking two encounters for episode of encounter.
 
           
 
               
 
                Indicates that the target Act provides evidence in support of the action represented by the source Act. The target is
 
                    not a 'reason' for the source act, but rather gives supporting information on why the source act is an appropriate course of action. Possible targets might be clinical trial
 
                    results, journal articles, similar successful therapies, etc. Rationale: Provides a mechanism for conveying clinical justification for non-approved or otherwise non-traditional
 
                    therapies.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description:The source act is aggravated by the target act. (Example "chest pain" EXACBY "exercise")
 
           
 
               
 
                This is the inversion of support. Used to indicate that a given observation is explained by another observation or
 
                    condition.
 
           
 
               
 
                Items located
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship that limits or restricts the source act by the elements of the target act. For example, an authorization may be
 
                    limited by a financial amount (up to $500). Target Act must be in EVN.CRIT mood.
 
           
 
               
 
                Definition: Indicates that the attributes and associations of the target act provide metadata (for example, identifiers,
 
                    authorship, etc.) for the source act. Constraint: Source act must have the Act.isCriterion attribute set to true. Target act must be an Act with a moodCode of EVN.
 
           
 
               
 
                An assertion that a new observation may be the manifestation of another existing observation or action. This assumption
 
                    is attributed to the same actor who asserts the manifestation. This is stronger and more specific than an inverted support link. For example, an agitated appearance can be asserted
 
                    to be the manifestation (effect) of a known hyperthyroxia. This expresses that one might not have realized a symptom if it would not be a common manifestation of a known condition.
 
                    The target (cause) may be any service, while the source (manifestation) must be an observation.
 
           
 
               
 
                Used to assign a "name" to a condition thread. Source is a condition node, target can be any service.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the target act is a predecessor instance to the source act. Generally each of these instances
 
                    is similar, but no identical. In healthcare coverage it is used to link a claim item to a previous claim item that might have claimed for the same set of services.
 
                A relationship in which the target act is a predecessor instance to the source act. Generally each of these instances is similar,
 
                    but no identical. In healthcare coverage it is used to link a claim item to a previous claim item that might have claimed for the same set of services.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the target act is referred to by the source act. This permits a simple reference relationship that
 
                    distinguishes between the referent and the referee.
 
           
 
               
 
                Indicates that the source act makes use of (or will make use of) the information content of the target act. UsageNotes: A usage
 
                    relationship only makes sense if the target act is authored and occurs independently of the source act. Otherwise a simpler relationship such as COMP would be appropriate.
 
                    Rationale: There is a need when defining a clinical trial protocol to indicate that the protocol makes use of other protocol or treatment specifications. This is stronger than the
 
                    assertion of "references". References may exist without usage, and in a clinical trial protocol is common to assert both: what other specifications does this trial use and what
 
                    other specifications does it merely reference.
 
           
 
               
 
                Reference ranges are essentially descriptors of a class of result values assumed to be "normal", "abnormal", or
 
                    "critical." Those can vary by sex, age, or any other criterion. Source and target are observations, the target is in criterion mood. This link type can act as a trigger in case of
 
                    alarms being triggered by critical results.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description:The source act is wholly or partially alleviated by the target act. (Example "chest pain" RELVBY "sublingual
 
                    nitroglycerin administration")
 
           
 
               
 
                Used to indicate that an existing service is suggesting evidence for a new observation. The assumption of support is attributed
 
                    to the same actor who asserts the observation. Source must be an observation, target may be any service (e.g., to indicate a status post).
 
           
 
               
 
                A specialization of "has support" (SPRT), used to relate a secondary observation to a Region of Interest on a
 
                    multidimensional observation, if the ROI specifies the true boundaries of the secondary observation as opposed to only marking the approximate area. For example, if the start and
 
                    end of an ST elevation episode is visible in an EKG, this relation would indicate the ROI bounds the "ST elevation" observation -- the ROI defines the true beginning and ending of
 
                    the episode. Conversely, if a ROI simply contains ST elevation, but it does not define the bounds (start and end) of the episode, the more general "has support" relation is used.
 
                    Likewise, if a ROI on an image defines the true bounds of a "1st degree burn", the relation "has bounded support" is used; but if the ROI only points to the approximate area of the
 
                    burn, the general "has support" relation is used.
 
           
 
               
 
                Relates an Act to its subject Act that the first Act is primarily concerned with. Examples The first Act may be a ControlAct
 
                    manipulating the subject Act The first act is a region of interest (ROI) that defines a region within the subject Act. The first act is a reporting or notification Act, that echos
 
                    the subject Act for a specific new purpose. Constraints An Act may have multiple subject acts. Rationale The ActRelationshipType "has subject" is similar to the ParticipationType
 
                    "subject", Acts that primarily operate on physical subjects use the Participation, those Acts that primarily operate on other Acts (other information) use the
 
                    ActRelationship.
 
           
 
               
 
                An act that contains summary values for a list or set of subordinate acts. For example, a summary of transactions for a
 
                    particular accounting period.
 
           
 
               
 
               
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act's effective time is wholly within the target act's effective time.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act's effective time overlaps the target act's effective time in any way.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship that defines the relative time of the end source act based on the time of the target
 
                    act.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act ends.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act starts.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act ends between the start and end of the target act.
 
           
 
               
 
                The source Act ends after the end of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne EBE ActTwo", it means that ActOne ends before
 
                    the end of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act ends before the target act starts.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends with the end of the target act's effective
 
                    time.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act's effective time is the same as the target act's effective time.
 
           
 
               
 
                The source Act ends when the target act starts (i.e. if we say "ActOne ECWS ActTwo", it means that ActOne ends
 
                    when ActTwo starts, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).
 
           
 
               
 
                The source Act starts after the end of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne SBE ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts
 
                    before the end of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).
 
           
 
               
 
                The source Act starts when the target act ends (i.e. if we say "ActOne SCWE ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts
 
                    when ActTwo ends, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship that defines the relative time of the start source act based on the time of the
 
                    target act.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act starts after the target act ends.
 
           
 
               
 
                The source Act starts after the start of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne SAS ActTwo", it means that ActOne
 
                    starts after the start of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act begins between the start and end of the target act.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act begins before the target act begins.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts with the start of the target act's effective
 
                    time.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship in which the source act's effective time is the same as the target act's effective time.
 
           
 
               
 
                Codes that describe the relationship between an Act and a financial instrument such as a financial transaction,
 
                    account or invoice element.
 
           
 
               
 
                Expresses values for describing the relationship relationship between an InvoiceElement or InvoiceElementGroup
 
                    and a billable act.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a charge to a clinical act (source). A
 
                    clinical act may have a charge associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the charge (bill) for delivery or performance of the
 
                    service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs
 
                    an organization to perform or deliver a service or product.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a cost to a clinical act (source). A
 
                    clinical act may have an inherit cost associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the cost of delivery or performance of the
 
                    service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs
 
                    an organization to perform or deliver a service or product.
 
           
 
               
 
                Expresses values for describing the relationship between a FinancialTransaction and an Account.
 
           
 
               
 
                A credit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A credit, once applied (posted), may have
 
                    either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account credit will decrease the account balance. A non-asset account credit
 
                    will decrease the account balance.
 
           
 
               
 
                A debit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A debit, once applied (posted), may have
 
                    either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account debit will increase the account balance. A non-asset account debit
 
                    will decrease the account balance.
 
           
 
               
 
                An act relationship indicating that the source act follows the target act. The source act should in principle represent the same
 
                    kind of act as the target. Source and target need not have the same mood code (mood will often differ). The target of a sequel is called antecedent. Examples for sequel
 
                    relationships are: revision, transformation, derivation from a prototype (as a specialization is a derivation of a generalization), followup, realization,
 
                    instantiation.
 
           
 
               
 
                An addendum (source) to an existing service object (target), containing supplemental information. The addendum is itself an
 
                    original service object linked to the supplemented service object. The supplemented service object remains in place and its content and status are unaltered.
 
           
 
               
 
                Indicates that the target observation(s) provide an initial reference for the source observation or observation group.
 
                    UsageConstraints: Both source and target must be Observations or specializations thereof.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description:The source act complies with, adheres to, conforms to, or is permissible under (in whole or in part) the policy,
 
                    contract, agreement, law, conformance criteria, certification guidelines or requirement conveyed by the target act. Examples for compliance relationships are: audits of adherence
 
                    with a security policy, certificate of conformance to system certification requirements, or consent directive in compliance with or permissible under a privacy
 
                    policy.
 
           
 
               
 
                The source act documents the target act.
 
           
 
               
 
                The source act fulfills (in whole or in part) the target act. Source act must be in a mood equal or more actual than the target
 
                    act.
 
           
 
               
 
                The source act is a single occurrence of a repeatable target act. The source and target act can be in any mood on the
 
                    "completion track" but the source act must be as far as or further along the track than the target act (i.e., the occurrence of an intent can be an event but not vice
 
                    versa).
 
                The source act is a single occurrence of a repeatable target act. The source and target act can be in any mood on the "completion
 
                    track" but the source act must be as far as or further along the track than the target act (i.e., the occurrence of an intent can be an event but not vice versa).
 
           
 
               
 
                Relates either an appointment request or an appointment to the order for the service being scheduled.
 
           
 
               
 
                Associates a specific time (and associated resources) with a scheduling request or other intent.
 
                Associates a specific time (and associated resources) with a scheduling request or other intent.
 
           
 
               
 
                The generalization relationship can be used to express categorical knowledge about services (e.g., amilorid,
 
                    triamterene, and spironolactone have the common generalization potassium sparing diuretic).
 
           
 
               
 
                A goal-evaluation links an observation (intent or actual) to a goal to indicate that the observation evaluates the goal.
 
                    Given the goal and the observation, a "goal distance" (e.g., goal to observation) can be "calculated" and need not be sent explicitly.
 
           
 
               
 
                Used to capture the link between a potential service ("master" or plan) and an actual service, where the actual
 
                    service instantiates the potential service. The instantiation may override the master's defaults.
 
           
 
               
 
                Definition: Used to link a newer version or 'snapshot' of a business object (source) to an older version or 'snapshot' of the same
 
                    business object (target). Usage:The identifier of the Act should be the same for both source and target. If the identifiers are distinct, RPLC should be used instead. Name from
 
                    source to target = "modifiesPrior" Name from target to source = "modifiesByNew"
 
           
 
               
 
                A trigger-match links an actual service (e.g., an observation or procedure that took place) with a service in criterion
 
                    mood. For example if the trigger is "observation of pain" and pain is actually observed, and if that pain-observation caused the trigger to fire, that pain-observation can be
 
                    linked with the trigger.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship between a source Act that provides more detailed properties to the target Act. The source act thus is a
 
                    specialization of the target act, but instead of mentioning all the inherited properties it only mentions new property bindings or refinements. The typical use case is to specify
 
                    certain alternative variants of one kind of Act. The priorityNumber attribute is used to weigh refinements as preferred over other alternative refinements. Example: several routing
 
                    options for a drug are specified as one SubstanceAdministration for the general treatment with attached refinements for the various routing options.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description:A relationship in which the target act is carried out to determine whether an effect attributed to the source act
 
                    can be recreated.
 
           
 
               
 
                A relationship between a source Act that seeks to reverse or undo the action of the prior target Act. Example: A posted financial
 
                    transaction (e.g., a debit transaction) was applied in error and must be reversed (e.g., by a credit transaction) the credit transaction is identified as an undo (or reversal) of
 
                    the prior target transaction. Constraints: the "completion track" mood of the target Act must be equally or more "actual" than the source act. I.e., when the target act is EVN the
 
                    source act can be EVN, or any INT. If the target act is INT, the source act can be INT.
 
           
 
               
 
                A replacement source act replaces an existing target act. The state of the target act being replaced becomes obselete, but the act
 
                    is typically still retained in the system for historical reference. The source and target must be of the same type.
 
           
 
               
 
                Definition: A new act that carries forward the intention of the original act, but does not completely replace it. The status of
 
                    the predecessor act must be 'completed'. The original act is the target act and the successor is the source act.
 
           
 
               
 
                A condition thread relationship specifically links condition nodes together to form a condition thread. The source is
 
                    the new condition node and the target links to the most recent node of the existing condition thread.
 
           
 
               
 
                The source is an excerpt from the target.
 
           
 
               
 
                The source is a direct quote from the target.
 
           
 
               
 
                Used when the target Act is a transformation of the source Act. (For instance, used to show that a CDA document is a
 
                    transformation of a DICOM SR document.)
 
           
 
               
 
                Description:Indicates that the target Act represents the result of the source observation Act. FormalConstraint: Source Act must
 
                    be an Observation or specialization there-of. Source Act must not have the value attribute specified UsageNote: This relationship allows the result of an observation to be fully
 
                    expressed as RIM acts as opposed to being embedded in the value attribute. For example, sending a Document act as the result of an imaging observation, sending a list of Procedures
 
                    and/or other acts as the result of a medical history observation. The valueNegationInd attribute on the source Act has the same semantics of "negated finding" when it applies to
 
                    the target of a VALUE ActRelationship as it does to the value attribute. On the other hand, if the ActRelationship.negationInd is true for a VALUE ActRelationship, that means the
 
                    specified observation does not have the indicated value but does not imply a negated finding. Because the semantics are extremely close, it is recommended that
 
                    Observation.valueNegationInd be used, not ActRelationship.negationInd. OpenIssue: The implications of negationInd on ActRelationship and the valueNegationind on
 
                    Observation.
 
           
 
               
 
                Specifies under what circumstances (target Act) the source-Act may, must, must not or has occurred
 
           
 
               
 
                A contraindication is just a negation of a reason, i.e. it gives a condition under which the action is not to be
 
                    done. Both, source and target can be any kind of service; target service is in criterion mood. How the strength of a contraindication is expressed (e.g., relative, absolute) is
 
                    left as an open issue. The priorityNumber attribute could be used.
 
           
 
               
 
                A requirement to be true before a service is performed. The target can be any service in criterion mood. For multiple
 
                    pre-conditions a conjunction attribute (AND, OR, XOR) is applicable.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The reason or rationale for a service. A reason link is weaker than a trigger, it only suggests that some service
 
                    may be or might have been a reason for some action, but not that this reason requires/required the action to be taken. Also, as opposed to the trigger, there is no strong timely
 
                    relation between the reason and the action. As well as providing various types of information about the rationale for a service, the RSON act relationship is routinely used between
 
                    a SBADM act and an OBS act to describe the indication for use of a medication. Child concepts may be used to describe types of indication. Discussion: In prior releases, the code
 
                    "SUGG" (suggests) was expressed as "an inversion of the reason link." That code has been retired in favor of the inversion indicator that is an attribute of
 
                    ActRelationship.
 
           
 
               
 
                Definition: The source act is performed to block the effects of the target act. This act relationship should be used when describing
 
                    near miss type incidents where potential harm could have occurred, but the action described in the source act blocked the potential harmful effects of the incident actually
 
                    occurring.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intended to help establish the presence of a (an adverse) situation described by the target act.
 
                    This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intented to provide immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act
 
                    describes an infectious disease)
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intended to provide active immunity against the effects of the target act (the
 
                    target act describes an infectious disease)
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intended to provide passive immunity against the effects of the target act (the
 
                    target act describes an infectious disease).
 
           
 
               
 
                The source act removes or lessens the occurrence or effect of the target act.
 
           
 
               
 
                Definition: The source act is performed to recover from the effects of the target act.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intended to reduce the risk of of an adverse situation to emerge as described by the target
 
                    act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intended to improve a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited
 
                    to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intended to offer an additional treatment for the management or cure of a pre-existing
 
                    adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature. It is not a
 
                    requirement that the non-adjunctive treatment is explicitly specified.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intended to provide long term maintenance improvement or management of a pre-existing
 
                    adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intended to provide palliation for the effects of the target act.
 
           
 
               
 
                Description: The source act is intented to provide symptomatic relief for the effects of the target act.
 
           
 
               
 
                A pre-condition that if true should result in the source Act being executed. The target is in typically in criterion mood. When
 
                    reported after the fact (i.e. the criterion has been met) it may be in Event mood. A delay between the trigger and the triggered action can be specified. Discussion: This includes
 
                    the concept of a required act for a service or financial instrument such as an insurance plan or policy. In such cases, the trigger is the occurrence of a specific condition such
 
                    as coverage limits being exceeded.
 
            |}
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|0-S
 
|0-S
 
|'''ART'''
 
|'''ART'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> act relationship type
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] act relationship type
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: A directed association between a source Act and a target Act. Usage Note: This code should never be transmitted in an instance as the value of ActRelationship.typeCode (attribute)</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: A directed association between a source Act and a target Act. Usage Note: This code should never be transmitted in an instance as the value of ActRelationship.typeCode (attribute)</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1-S
 
|1-S
 
|'''COMP'''
 
|'''COMP'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has component
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has component
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A collection of sub-services as steps or subtasks performed for the source service. Services may be performed sequentially or concurrently.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A collection of sub-services as steps or subtasks performed for the source service. Services may be performed sequentially or concurrently.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''ARR'''
 
|'''ARR'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> arrival
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] arrival
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source Act entered into the source Act by means of the target Transportation act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source Act entered into the source Act by means of the target Transportation act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''CTRLV'''
 
|'''CTRLV'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has control variable
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has control variable
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship from an Act to a Control Variable. For example, if a Device makes an Observation, this relates the Observation to its Control Variables documenting the device's settings that influenced the observation.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship from an Act to a Control Variable. For example, if a Device makes an Observation, this relates the Observation to its Control Variables documenting the device's settings that influenced the observation.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''DEP'''
 
|'''DEP'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> departure
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] departure
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source Act departed from the source Act by means of the target Transportation act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source Act departed from the source Act by means of the target Transportation act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1-S
 
|1-S
 
|'''OUTC'''
 
|'''OUTC'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has outcome
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has outcome
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An observation that should follow or does actually follow as a result or consequence of a condition or action (sometimes called "post-conditional".) Target must be an observation as a goal, risk or any criterion. For complex outcomes a conjunction attribute (AND, OR, XOR) can be used. An outcome link is often inverted to describe an outcome assessment.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An observation that should follow or does actually follow as a result or consequence of a condition or action (sometimes called "post-conditional".) Target must be an observation as a goal, risk or any criterion. For complex outcomes a conjunction attribute (AND, OR, XOR) can be used. An outcome link is often inverted to describe an outcome assessment.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''GOAL'''
 
|'''GOAL'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has goal
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has goal
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A goal that one defines given a patient's health condition. Subsequently planned actions aim to meet that goal. Source is an observation or condition node, target must be an observation in goal mood.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A goal that one defines given a patient's health condition. Subsequently planned actions aim to meet that goal. Source is an observation or condition node, target must be an observation in goal mood.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''RISK'''
 
|'''RISK'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has risk
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has risk
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A noteworthy undesired outcome of a patient's condition that is either likely enough to become an issue or is less likely but dangerous enough to be addressed.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A noteworthy undesired outcome of a patient's condition that is either likely enough to become an issue or is less likely but dangerous enough to be addressed.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-A
 
|2-A
 
|_ActRelationsipObjective
 
|_ActRelationsipObjective
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> Act Relationsip Objective
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] Act Relationsip Objective
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The target act is a desired outcome of the source act. Source is any act (typically an intervention). Target must be an observation in criterion mood.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The target act is a desired outcome of the source act. Source is any act (typically an intervention). Target must be an observation in criterion mood.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''OBJC'''
 
|'''OBJC'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has continuing objective
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has continuing objective
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A desired state that a service action aims to maintain. E.g., keep systolic blood pressure between 90 and 110 mm Hg. Source is an intervention service. Target must be an observation in criterion mood.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A desired state that a service action aims to maintain. E.g., keep systolic blood pressure between 90 and 110 mm Hg. Source is an intervention service. Target must be an observation in criterion mood.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''OBJF'''
 
|'''OBJF'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has final objective
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has final objective
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A desired outcome that a service action aims to meet finally. Source is any service (typically an intervention). Target must be an observation in criterion mood.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A desired outcome that a service action aims to meet finally. Source is any service (typically an intervention). Target must be an observation in criterion mood.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1-S
 
|1-S
 
|'''PERT'''
 
|'''PERT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has pertinent information
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has pertinent information
 
| colspan="2" |<p>This is a very unspecific relationship from one item of clinical information to another. It does not judge about the role the pertinent information plays.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>This is a very unspecific relationship from one item of clinical information to another. It does not judge about the role the pertinent information plays.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''AUTH'''
 
|'''AUTH'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> authorized by
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] authorized by
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the target act authorizes or certifies the source act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the target act authorizes or certifies the source act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''CAUS'''
 
|'''CAUS'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> is etiology for
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] is etiology for
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: An assertion that an act was the cause of another act.This is stronger and more specific than the support link. The source (cause) is typically an observation, but may be any act, while the target may be any act. Examples: a growth of Staphylococcus aureus may be considered the cause of an abscess contamination of the infusion bag was deemed to be the cause of the infection that the patient experienced lack of staff on the shift was deemed to be a supporting factor (proximal factor) causing the patient safety incident where the patient fell out of bed because the bed-sides had not been put up which caused the night patient to fall out of bed</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: An assertion that an act was the cause of another act.This is stronger and more specific than the support link. The source (cause) is typically an observation, but may be any act, while the target may be any act. Examples: a growth of Staphylococcus aureus may be considered the cause of an abscess contamination of the infusion bag was deemed to be the cause of the infection that the patient experienced lack of staff on the shift was deemed to be a supporting factor (proximal factor) causing the patient safety incident where the patient fell out of bed because the bed-sides had not been put up which caused the night patient to fall out of bed</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''COVBY'''
 
|'''COVBY'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> covered by
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] covered by
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act is covered by or is under the authority of a target act. A financial instrument such as an Invoice Element is covered by one or more specific instances of an Insurance Policy.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act is covered by or is under the authority of a target act. A financial instrument such as an Invoice Element is covered by one or more specific instances of an Insurance Policy.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''DRIV'''
 
|'''DRIV'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> is derived from
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] is derived from
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Associates a derived Act with its input parameters. E.G., an anion-gap observation can be associated as being derived from given sodium-, (potassium-,), chloride-, and bicarbonate-observations. The narrative content (Act.text) of a source act is wholly machine-derived from the collection of target acts.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Associates a derived Act with its input parameters. E.G., an anion-gap observation can be associated as being derived from given sodium-, (potassium-,), chloride-, and bicarbonate-observations. The narrative content (Act.text) of a source act is wholly machine-derived from the collection of target acts.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''ELNK'''
 
|'''ELNK'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> episodeLink
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] episodeLink
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Expresses an association that links two instances of the same act over time, indicating that the instance are part of the same episode, e.g. linking two condition nodes for episode of illness; linking two encounters for episode of encounter.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Expresses an association that links two instances of the same act over time, indicating that the instance are part of the same episode, e.g. linking two condition nodes for episode of illness; linking two encounters for episode of encounter.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''EVID'''
 
|'''EVID'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> provides evidence for
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] provides evidence for
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Indicates that the target Act provides evidence in support of the action represented by the source Act. The target is not a 'reason' for the source act, but rather gives supporting information on why the source act is an appropriate course of action. Possible targets might be clinical trial results, journal articles, similar successful therapies, etc. Rationale: Provides a mechanism for conveying clinical justification for non-approved or otherwise non-traditional therapies.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Indicates that the target Act provides evidence in support of the action represented by the source Act. The target is not a 'reason' for the source act, but rather gives supporting information on why the source act is an appropriate course of action. Possible targets might be clinical trial results, journal articles, similar successful therapies, etc. Rationale: Provides a mechanism for conveying clinical justification for non-approved or otherwise non-traditional therapies.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''EXACBY'''
 
|'''EXACBY'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> exacerbated by
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] exacerbated by
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:The source act is aggravated by the target act. (Example "chest pain" EXACBY "exercise")</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:The source act is aggravated by the target act. (Example "chest pain" EXACBY "exercise")</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''EXPL'''
 
|'''EXPL'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has explanation
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has explanation
 
| colspan="2" |<p>This is the inversion of support. Used to indicate that a given observation is explained by another observation or condition.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>This is the inversion of support. Used to indicate that a given observation is explained by another observation or condition.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''ITEMSLOC'''
 
|'''ITEMSLOC'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> items located
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] items located
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Items located</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Items located</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''LIMIT'''
 
|'''LIMIT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> limited by
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] limited by
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that limits or restricts the source act by the elements of the target act. For example, an authorization may be limited by a financial amount (up to $500). Target Act must be in EVN.CRIT mood.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that limits or restricts the source act by the elements of the target act. For example, an authorization may be limited by a financial amount (up to $500). Target Act must be in EVN.CRIT mood.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''META'''
 
|'''META'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has metadata
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has metadata
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: Indicates that the attributes and associations of the target act provide metadata (for example, identifiers, authorship, etc.) for the source act. Constraint: Source act must have the Act.isCriterion attribute set to true. Target act must be an Act with a moodCode of EVN.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: Indicates that the attributes and associations of the target act provide metadata (for example, identifiers, authorship, etc.) for the source act. Constraint: Source act must have the Act.isCriterion attribute set to true. Target act must be an Act with a moodCode of EVN.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''MFST'''
 
|'''MFST'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> is manifestation of
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] is manifestation of
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An assertion that a new observation may be the manifestation of another existing observation or action. This assumption is attributed to the same actor who asserts the manifestation. This is stronger and more specific than an inverted support link. For example, an agitated appearance can be asserted to be the manifestation (effect) of a known hyperthyroxia. This expresses that one might not have realized a symptom if it would not be a common manifestation of a known condition. The target (cause) may be any service, while the source (manifestation) must be an observation.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An assertion that a new observation may be the manifestation of another existing observation or action. This assumption is attributed to the same actor who asserts the manifestation. This is stronger and more specific than an inverted support link. For example, an agitated appearance can be asserted to be the manifestation (effect) of a known hyperthyroxia. This expresses that one might not have realized a symptom if it would not be a common manifestation of a known condition. The target (cause) may be any service, while the source (manifestation) must be an observation.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''NAME'''
 
|'''NAME'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> assigns name
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] assigns name
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Used to assign a "name" to a condition thread. Source is a condition node, target can be any service.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Used to assign a "name" to a condition thread. Source is a condition node, target can be any service.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''PREV'''
 
|'''PREV'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has previous instance
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has previous instance
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the target act is a predecessor instance to the source act. Generally each of these instances is similar, but no identical. In healthcare coverage it is used to link a claim item to a previous claim item that might have claimed for the same set of services.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the target act is a predecessor instance to the source act. Generally each of these instances is similar, but no identical. In healthcare coverage it is used to link a claim item to a previous claim item that might have claimed for the same set of services.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-S
 
|2-S
 
|'''REFR'''
 
|'''REFR'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> refers to
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] refers to
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the target act is referred to by the source act. This permits a simple reference relationship that distinguishes between the referent and the referee.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the target act is referred to by the source act. This permits a simple reference relationship that distinguishes between the referent and the referee.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''USE'''
 
|'''USE'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> uses
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] uses
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Indicates that the source act makes use of (or will make use of) the information content of the target act. UsageNotes: A usage relationship only makes sense if the target act is authored and occurs independently of the source act. Otherwise a simpler relationship such as COMP would be appropriate. Rationale: There is a need when defining a clinical trial protocol to indicate that the protocol makes use of other protocol or treatment specifications. This is stronger than the assertion of "references". References may exist without usage, and in a clinical trial protocol is common to assert both: what other specifications does this trial use and what other specifications does it merely reference.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Indicates that the source act makes use of (or will make use of) the information content of the target act. UsageNotes: A usage relationship only makes sense if the target act is authored and occurs independently of the source act. Otherwise a simpler relationship such as COMP would be appropriate. Rationale: There is a need when defining a clinical trial protocol to indicate that the protocol makes use of other protocol or treatment specifications. This is stronger than the assertion of "references". References may exist without usage, and in a clinical trial protocol is common to assert both: what other specifications does this trial use and what other specifications does it merely reference.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''REFV'''
 
|'''REFV'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has reference values
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has reference values
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Reference ranges are essentially descriptors of a class of result values assumed to be "normal", "abnormal", or "critical." Those can vary by sex, age, or any other criterion. Source and target are observations, the target is in criterion mood. This link type can act as a trigger in case of alarms being triggered by critical results.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Reference ranges are essentially descriptors of a class of result values assumed to be "normal", "abnormal", or "critical." Those can vary by sex, age, or any other criterion. Source and target are observations, the target is in criterion mood. This link type can act as a trigger in case of alarms being triggered by critical results.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''RELVBY'''
 
|'''RELVBY'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> relieved by
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] relieved by
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:The source act is wholly or partially alleviated by the target act. (Example "chest pain" RELVBY "sublingual nitroglycerin administration")</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:The source act is wholly or partially alleviated by the target act. (Example "chest pain" RELVBY "sublingual nitroglycerin administration")</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-S
 
|2-S
 
|'''SPRT'''
 
|'''SPRT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has support
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has support
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Used to indicate that an existing service is suggesting evidence for a new observation. The assumption of support is attributed to the same actor who asserts the observation. Source must be an observation, target may be any service (e.g., to indicate a status post).</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Used to indicate that an existing service is suggesting evidence for a new observation. The assumption of support is attributed to the same actor who asserts the observation. Source must be an observation, target may be any service (e.g., to indicate a status post).</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''SPRTBND'''
 
|'''SPRTBND'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has bounded support
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has bounded support
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A specialization of "has support" (SPRT), used to relate a secondary observation to a Region of Interest on a multidimensional observation, if the ROI specifies the true boundaries of the secondary observation as opposed to only marking the approximate area. For example, if the start and end of an ST elevation episode is visible in an EKG, this relation would indicate the ROI bounds the "ST elevation" observation -- the ROI defines the true beginning and ending of the episode. Conversely, if a ROI simply contains ST elevation, but it does not define the bounds (start and end) of the episode, the more general "has support" relation is used. Likewise, if a ROI on an image defines the true bounds of a "1st degree burn", the relation "has bounded support" is used; but if the ROI only points to the approximate area of the burn, the general "has support" relation is used.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A specialization of "has support" (SPRT), used to relate a secondary observation to a Region of Interest on a multidimensional observation, if the ROI specifies the true boundaries of the secondary observation as opposed to only marking the approximate area. For example, if the start and end of an ST elevation episode is visible in an EKG, this relation would indicate the ROI bounds the "ST elevation" observation -- the ROI defines the true beginning and ending of the episode. Conversely, if a ROI simply contains ST elevation, but it does not define the bounds (start and end) of the episode, the more general "has support" relation is used. Likewise, if a ROI on an image defines the true bounds of a "1st degree burn", the relation "has bounded support" is used; but if the ROI only points to the approximate area of the burn, the general "has support" relation is used.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''SUBJ'''
 
|'''SUBJ'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has subject
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has subject
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Relates an Act to its subject Act that the first Act is primarily concerned with. Examples The first Act may be a ControlAct manipulating the subject Act The first act is a region of interest (ROI) that defines a region within the subject Act. The first act is a reporting or notification Act, that echos the subject Act for a specific new purpose. Constraints An Act may have multiple subject acts. Rationale The ActRelationshipType "has subject" is similar to the ParticipationType "subject", Acts that primarily operate on physical subjects use the Participation, those Acts that primarily operate on other Acts (other information) use the ActRelationship.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Relates an Act to its subject Act that the first Act is primarily concerned with. Examples The first Act may be a ControlAct manipulating the subject Act The first act is a region of interest (ROI) that defines a region within the subject Act. The first act is a reporting or notification Act, that echos the subject Act for a specific new purpose. Constraints An Act may have multiple subject acts. Rationale The ActRelationshipType "has subject" is similar to the ParticipationType "subject", Acts that primarily operate on physical subjects use the Participation, those Acts that primarily operate on other Acts (other information) use the ActRelationship.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''SUMM'''
 
|'''SUMM'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> summarized by
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] summarized by
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An act that contains summary values for a list or set of subordinate acts. For example, a summary of transactions for a particular accounting period.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An act that contains summary values for a list or set of subordinate acts. For example, a summary of transactions for a particular accounting period.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-A
 
|2-A
 
|_ActClassTemporallyPertains
 
|_ActClassTemporallyPertains
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ActClassTemporallyPertains
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ActClassTemporallyPertains
 
| colspan="2" |<p></p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p></p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''DURING'''
 
|'''DURING'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> occurs during
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] occurs during
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time is wholly within the target act's effective time.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time is wholly within the target act's effective time.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''OVERLAP'''
 
|'''OVERLAP'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> overlaps with
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] overlaps with
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time overlaps the target act's effective time in any way.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time overlaps the target act's effective time in any way.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-A
 
|3-A
 
|_ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsEnd
 
|_ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsEnd
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsEnd
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsEnd
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that defines the relative time of the end source act based on the time of the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that defines the relative time of the end source act based on the time of the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''EAE'''
 
|'''EAE'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ends after end of
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ends after end of
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act ends.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act ends.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-S
 
|4-S
 
|'''EAS'''
 
|'''EAS'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ends after start of
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ends after start of
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act starts.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act starts.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|5-L
 
|5-L
 
|'''EDU'''
 
|'''EDU'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ends during
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ends during
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act ends between the start and end of the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act ends between the start and end of the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''EBE'''
 
|'''EBE'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ends before end
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ends before end
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act ends after the end of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne EBE ActTwo", it means that ActOne ends before the end of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act ends after the end of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne EBE ActTwo", it means that ActOne ends before the end of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''EBS'''
 
|'''EBS'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ends before start of
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ends before start of
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act ends before the target act starts.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act ends before the target act starts.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-S
 
|4-S
 
|'''ECW'''
 
|'''ECW'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ends concurrent with
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ends concurrent with
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends with the end of the target act's effective time.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends with the end of the target act's effective time.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|5-L
 
|5-L
 
|'''CONCURRENT'''
 
|'''CONCURRENT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> concurrent with
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] concurrent with
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time is the same as the target act's effective time.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time is the same as the target act's effective time.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''ECWS'''
 
|'''ECWS'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ends concurrent with start
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ends concurrent with start
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act ends when the target act starts (i.e. if we say "ActOne ECWS ActTwo", it means that ActOne ends when ActTwo starts, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act ends when the target act starts (i.e. if we say "ActOne ECWS ActTwo", it means that ActOne ends when ActTwo starts, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''SBE'''
 
|'''SBE'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> starts before end
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] starts before end
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act starts after the end of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne SBE ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts before the end of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act starts after the end of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne SBE ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts before the end of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''SCWE'''
 
|'''SCWE'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> starts concurrent with end
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] starts concurrent with end
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act starts when the target act ends (i.e. if we say "ActOne SCWE ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts when ActTwo ends, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act starts when the target act ends (i.e. if we say "ActOne SCWE ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts when ActTwo ends, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-A
 
|3-A
 
|_ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsStart
 
|_ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsStart
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsStart
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsStart
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that defines the relative time of the start source act based on the time of the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that defines the relative time of the start source act based on the time of the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''SAE'''
 
|'''SAE'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> starts after end of
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] starts after end of
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act starts after the target act ends.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act starts after the target act ends.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-S
 
|4-S
 
|'''SAS'''
 
|'''SAS'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> starts after start of
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] starts after start of
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act starts after the start of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne SAS ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts after the start of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source Act starts after the start of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne SAS ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts after the start of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|5-L
 
|5-L
 
|'''SDU'''
 
|'''SDU'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> starts during
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] starts during
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act begins between the start and end of the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act begins between the start and end of the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''SBS'''
 
|'''SBS'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> starts before start of
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] starts before start of
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act begins before the target act begins.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act begins before the target act begins.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-S
 
|4-S
 
|'''SCW'''
 
|'''SCW'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> starts concurrent with
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] starts concurrent with
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts with the start of the target act's effective time.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts with the start of the target act's effective time.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|5-L
 
|5-L
 
|'''CONCURRENT'''
 
|'''CONCURRENT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> concurrent with
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] concurrent with
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time is the same as the target act's effective time.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship in which the source act's effective time is the same as the target act's effective time.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-A
 
|2-A
 
|_ActRelationshipAccounting
 
|_ActRelationshipAccounting
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ActRelationshipAccounting
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ActRelationshipAccounting
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Codes that describe the relationship between an Act and a financial instrument such as a financial transaction, account or invoice element.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Codes that describe the relationship between an Act and a financial instrument such as a financial transaction, account or invoice element.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-A
 
|3-A
 
|_ActRelationshipCostTracking
 
|_ActRelationshipCostTracking
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ActRelationshipCostTracking
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ActRelationshipCostTracking
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Expresses values for describing the relationship relationship between an InvoiceElement or InvoiceElementGroup and a billable act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Expresses values for describing the relationship relationship between an InvoiceElement or InvoiceElementGroup and a billable act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''CHRG'''
 
|'''CHRG'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has charge
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has charge
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a charge to a clinical act (source). A clinical act may have a charge associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the charge (bill) for delivery or performance of the service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs an organization to perform or deliver a service or product.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a charge to a clinical act (source). A clinical act may have a charge associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the charge (bill) for delivery or performance of the service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs an organization to perform or deliver a service or product.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''COST'''
 
|'''COST'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has cost
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has cost
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a cost to a clinical act (source). A clinical act may have an inherit cost associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the cost of delivery or performance of the service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs an organization to perform or deliver a service or product.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a cost to a clinical act (source). A clinical act may have an inherit cost associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the cost of delivery or performance of the service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs an organization to perform or deliver a service or product.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-A
 
|3-A
 
|_ActRelationshipPosting
 
|_ActRelationshipPosting
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ActRelationshipPosting
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ActRelationshipPosting
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Expresses values for describing the relationship between a FinancialTransaction and an Account.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Expresses values for describing the relationship between a FinancialTransaction and an Account.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''CREDIT'''
 
|'''CREDIT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has credit
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has credit
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A credit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A credit, once applied (posted), may have either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account credit will decrease the account balance. A non-asset account credit will decrease the account balance.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A credit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A credit, once applied (posted), may have either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account credit will decrease the account balance. A non-asset account credit will decrease the account balance.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''DEBIT'''
 
|'''DEBIT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has debit
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has debit
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A debit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A debit, once applied (posted), may have either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account debit will increase the account balance. A non-asset account debit will decrease the account balance.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A debit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A debit, once applied (posted), may have either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account debit will increase the account balance. A non-asset account debit will decrease the account balance.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1-S
 
|1-S
 
|'''SEQL'''
 
|'''SEQL'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> is sequel
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] is sequel
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An act relationship indicating that the source act follows the target act. The source act should in principle represent the same kind of act as the target. Source and target need not have the same mood code (mood will often differ). The target of a sequel is called antecedent. Examples for sequel relationships are: revision, transformation, derivation from a prototype (as a specialization is a derivation of a generalization), followup, realization, instantiation.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An act relationship indicating that the source act follows the target act. The source act should in principle represent the same kind of act as the target. Source and target need not have the same mood code (mood will often differ). The target of a sequel is called antecedent. Examples for sequel relationships are: revision, transformation, derivation from a prototype (as a specialization is a derivation of a generalization), followup, realization, instantiation.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''APND'''
 
|'''APND'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> is appendage
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] is appendage
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An addendum (source) to an existing service object (target), containing supplemental information. The addendum is itself an original service object linked to the supplemented service object. The supplemented service object remains in place and its content and status are unaltered.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>An addendum (source) to an existing service object (target), containing supplemental information. The addendum is itself an original service object linked to the supplemented service object. The supplemented service object remains in place and its content and status are unaltered.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''BSLN'''
 
|'''BSLN'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has baseline
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has baseline
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Indicates that the target observation(s) provide an initial reference for the source observation or observation group. UsageConstraints: Both source and target must be Observations or specializations thereof.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Indicates that the target observation(s) provide an initial reference for the source observation or observation group. UsageConstraints: Both source and target must be Observations or specializations thereof.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''COMPLY'''
 
|'''COMPLY'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> complies with
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] complies with
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:The source act complies with, adheres to, conforms to, or is permissible under (in whole or in part) the policy, contract, agreement, law, conformance criteria, certification guidelines or requirement conveyed by the target act. Examples for compliance relationships are: audits of adherence with a security policy, certificate of conformance to system certification requirements, or consent directive in compliance with or permissible under a privacy policy.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:The source act complies with, adheres to, conforms to, or is permissible under (in whole or in part) the policy, contract, agreement, law, conformance criteria, certification guidelines or requirement conveyed by the target act. Examples for compliance relationships are: audits of adherence with a security policy, certificate of conformance to system certification requirements, or consent directive in compliance with or permissible under a privacy policy.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''DOC'''
 
|'''DOC'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> documents
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] documents
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source act documents the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source act documents the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-S
 
|2-S
 
|'''FLFS'''
 
|'''FLFS'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> fulfills
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] fulfills
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source act fulfills (in whole or in part) the target act. Source act must be in a mood equal or more actual than the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source act fulfills (in whole or in part) the target act. Source act must be in a mood equal or more actual than the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''OCCR'''
 
|'''OCCR'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> occurrence
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] occurrence
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source act is a single occurrence of a repeatable target act. The source and target act can be in any mood on the "completion track" but the source act must be as far as or further along the track than the target act (i.e., the occurrence of an intent can be an event but not vice versa).</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source act is a single occurrence of a repeatable target act. The source and target act can be in any mood on the "completion track" but the source act must be as far as or further along the track than the target act (i.e., the occurrence of an intent can be an event but not vice versa).</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''OREF'''
 
|'''OREF'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> references order
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] references order
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Relates either an appointment request or an appointment to the order for the service being scheduled.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Relates either an appointment request or an appointment to the order for the service being scheduled.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''SCH'''
 
|'''SCH'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> schedules request
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] schedules request
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Associates a specific time (and associated resources) with a scheduling request or other intent.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Associates a specific time (and associated resources) with a scheduling request or other intent.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''GEN'''
 
|'''GEN'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has generalization
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has generalization
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The generalization relationship can be used to express categorical knowledge about services (e.g., amilorid, triamterene, and spironolactone have the common generalization potassium sparing diuretic).</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The generalization relationship can be used to express categorical knowledge about services (e.g., amilorid, triamterene, and spironolactone have the common generalization potassium sparing diuretic).</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''GEVL'''
 
|'''GEVL'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> evaluates (goal)
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] evaluates (goal)
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A goal-evaluation links an observation (intent or actual) to a goal to indicate that the observation evaluates the goal. Given the goal and the observation, a "goal distance" (e.g., goal to observation) can be "calculated" and need not be sent explicitly.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A goal-evaluation links an observation (intent or actual) to a goal to indicate that the observation evaluates the goal. Given the goal and the observation, a "goal distance" (e.g., goal to observation) can be "calculated" and need not be sent explicitly.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''INST'''
 
|'''INST'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> instantiates (master)
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] instantiates (master)
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Used to capture the link between a potential service ("master" or plan) and an actual service, where the actual service instantiates the potential service. The instantiation may override the master's defaults.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Used to capture the link between a potential service ("master" or plan) and an actual service, where the actual service instantiates the potential service. The instantiation may override the master's defaults.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''MOD'''
 
|'''MOD'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> modifies
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] modifies
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: Used to link a newer version or 'snapshot' of a business object (source) to an older version or 'snapshot' of the same business object (target). Usage:The identifier of the Act should be the same for both source and target. If the identifiers are distinct, RPLC should be used instead. Name from source to target = "modifiesPrior" Name from target to source = "modifiesByNew"</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: Used to link a newer version or 'snapshot' of a business object (source) to an older version or 'snapshot' of the same business object (target). Usage:The identifier of the Act should be the same for both source and target. If the identifiers are distinct, RPLC should be used instead. Name from source to target = "modifiesPrior" Name from target to source = "modifiesByNew"</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''MTCH'''
 
|'''MTCH'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> matches (trigger)
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] matches (trigger)
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A trigger-match links an actual service (e.g., an observation or procedure that took place) with a service in criterion mood. For example if the trigger is "observation of pain" and pain is actually observed, and if that pain-observation caused the trigger to fire, that pain-observation can be linked with the trigger.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A trigger-match links an actual service (e.g., an observation or procedure that took place) with a service in criterion mood. For example if the trigger is "observation of pain" and pain is actually observed, and if that pain-observation caused the trigger to fire, that pain-observation can be linked with the trigger.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''OPTN'''
 
|'''OPTN'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has option
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has option
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship between a source Act that provides more detailed properties to the target Act. The source act thus is a specialization of the target act, but instead of mentioning all the inherited properties it only mentions new property bindings or refinements. The typical use case is to specify certain alternative variants of one kind of Act. The priorityNumber attribute is used to weigh refinements as preferred over other alternative refinements. Example: several routing options for a drug are specified as one SubstanceAdministration for the general treatment with attached refinements for the various routing options.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship between a source Act that provides more detailed properties to the target Act. The source act thus is a specialization of the target act, but instead of mentioning all the inherited properties it only mentions new property bindings or refinements. The typical use case is to specify certain alternative variants of one kind of Act. The priorityNumber attribute is used to weigh refinements as preferred over other alternative refinements. Example: several routing options for a drug are specified as one SubstanceAdministration for the general treatment with attached refinements for the various routing options.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''RCHAL'''
 
|'''RCHAL'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> re-challenge
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] re-challenge
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:A relationship in which the target act is carried out to determine whether an effect attributed to the source act can be recreated.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:A relationship in which the target act is carried out to determine whether an effect attributed to the source act can be recreated.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''REV'''
 
|'''REV'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> reverses
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] reverses
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship between a source Act that seeks to reverse or undo the action of the prior target Act. Example: A posted financial transaction (e.g., a debit transaction) was applied in error and must be reversed (e.g., by a credit transaction) the credit transaction is identified as an undo (or reversal) of the prior target transaction. Constraints: the "completion track" mood of the target Act must be equally or more "actual" than the source act. I.e., when the target act is EVN the source act can be EVN, or any INT. If the target act is INT, the source act can be INT.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A relationship between a source Act that seeks to reverse or undo the action of the prior target Act. Example: A posted financial transaction (e.g., a debit transaction) was applied in error and must be reversed (e.g., by a credit transaction) the credit transaction is identified as an undo (or reversal) of the prior target transaction. Constraints: the "completion track" mood of the target Act must be equally or more "actual" than the source act. I.e., when the target act is EVN the source act can be EVN, or any INT. If the target act is INT, the source act can be INT.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''RPLC'''
 
|'''RPLC'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> replaces
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] replaces
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A replacement source act replaces an existing target act. The state of the target act being replaced becomes obselete, but the act is typically still retained in the system for historical reference. The source and target must be of the same type.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A replacement source act replaces an existing target act. The state of the target act being replaced becomes obselete, but the act is typically still retained in the system for historical reference. The source and target must be of the same type.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''SUCC'''
 
|'''SUCC'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> succeeds
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] succeeds
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: A new act that carries forward the intention of the original act, but does not completely replace it. The status of the predecessor act must be 'completed'. The original act is the target act and the successor is the source act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: A new act that carries forward the intention of the original act, but does not completely replace it. The status of the predecessor act must be 'completed'. The original act is the target act and the successor is the source act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''UPDT'''
 
|'''UPDT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> updates (condition)
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] updates (condition)
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A condition thread relationship specifically links condition nodes together to form a condition thread. The source is the new condition node and the target links to the most recent node of the existing condition thread.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A condition thread relationship specifically links condition nodes together to form a condition thread. The source is the new condition node and the target links to the most recent node of the existing condition thread.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-S
 
|2-S
 
|'''XCRPT'''
 
|'''XCRPT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> Excerpts
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] Excerpts
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source is an excerpt from the target.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source is an excerpt from the target.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''VRXCRPT'''
 
|'''VRXCRPT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> Excerpt verbatim
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] Excerpt verbatim
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source is a direct quote from the target.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source is a direct quote from the target.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''XFRM'''
 
|'''XFRM'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> transformation
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] transformation
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Used when the target Act is a transformation of the source Act. (For instance, used to show that a CDA document is a transformation of a DICOM SR document.)</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Used when the target Act is a transformation of the source Act. (For instance, used to show that a CDA document is a transformation of a DICOM SR document.)</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1-L
 
|1-L
 
|'''VALUE'''
 
|'''VALUE'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has value
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has value
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:Indicates that the target Act represents the result of the source observation Act. FormalConstraint: Source Act must be an Observation or specialization there-of. Source Act must not have the value attribute specified UsageNote: This relationship allows the result of an observation to be fully expressed as RIM acts as opposed to being embedded in the value attribute. For example, sending a Document act as the result of an imaging observation, sending a list of Procedures and/or other acts as the result of a medical history observation. The valueNegationInd attribute on the source Act has the same semantics of "negated finding" when it applies to the target of a VALUE ActRelationship as it does to the value attribute. On the other hand, if the ActRelationship.negationInd is true for a VALUE ActRelationship, that means the specified observation does not have the indicated value but does not imply a negated finding. Because the semantics are extremely close, it is recommended that Observation.valueNegationInd be used, not ActRelationship.negationInd. OpenIssue: The implications of negationInd on ActRelationship and the valueNegationind on Observation.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description:Indicates that the target Act represents the result of the source observation Act. FormalConstraint: Source Act must be an Observation or specialization there-of. Source Act must not have the value attribute specified UsageNote: This relationship allows the result of an observation to be fully expressed as RIM acts as opposed to being embedded in the value attribute. For example, sending a Document act as the result of an imaging observation, sending a list of Procedures and/or other acts as the result of a medical history observation. The valueNegationInd attribute on the source Act has the same semantics of "negated finding" when it applies to the target of a VALUE ActRelationship as it does to the value attribute. On the other hand, if the ActRelationship.negationInd is true for a VALUE ActRelationship, that means the specified observation does not have the indicated value but does not imply a negated finding. Because the semantics are extremely close, it is recommended that Observation.valueNegationInd be used, not ActRelationship.negationInd. OpenIssue: The implications of negationInd on ActRelationship and the valueNegationind on Observation.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1-A
 
|1-A
 
|_ActRelationshipConditional
 
|_ActRelationshipConditional
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> ActRelationshipConditional
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] ActRelationshipConditional
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Specifies under what circumstances (target Act) the source-Act may, must, must not or has occurred</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Specifies under what circumstances (target Act) the source-Act may, must, must not or has occurred</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''CIND'''
 
|'''CIND'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has contra-indication
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has contra-indication
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A contraindication is just a negation of a reason, i.e. it gives a condition under which the action is not to be done. Both, source and target can be any kind of service; target service is in criterion mood. How the strength of a contraindication is expressed (e.g., relative, absolute) is left as an open issue. The priorityNumber attribute could be used.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A contraindication is just a negation of a reason, i.e. it gives a condition under which the action is not to be done. Both, source and target can be any kind of service; target service is in criterion mood. How the strength of a contraindication is expressed (e.g., relative, absolute) is left as an open issue. The priorityNumber attribute could be used.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''PRCN'''
 
|'''PRCN'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has pre-condition
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has pre-condition
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A requirement to be true before a service is performed. The target can be any service in criterion mood. For multiple pre-conditions a conjunction attribute (AND, OR, XOR) is applicable.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A requirement to be true before a service is performed. The target can be any service in criterion mood. For multiple pre-conditions a conjunction attribute (AND, OR, XOR) is applicable.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-S
 
|2-S
 
|'''RSON'''
 
|'''RSON'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has reason
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has reason
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The reason or rationale for a service. A reason link is weaker than a trigger, it only suggests that some service may be or might have been a reason for some action, but not that this reason requires/required the action to be taken. Also, as opposed to the trigger, there is no strong timely relation between the reason and the action. As well as providing various types of information about the rationale for a service, the RSON act relationship is routinely used between a SBADM act and an OBS act to describe the indication for use of a medication. Child concepts may be used to describe types of indication. Discussion: In prior releases, the code "SUGG" (suggests) was expressed as "an inversion of the reason link." That code has been retired in favor of the inversion indicator that is an attribute of ActRelationship.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The reason or rationale for a service. A reason link is weaker than a trigger, it only suggests that some service may be or might have been a reason for some action, but not that this reason requires/required the action to be taken. Also, as opposed to the trigger, there is no strong timely relation between the reason and the action. As well as providing various types of information about the rationale for a service, the RSON act relationship is routinely used between a SBADM act and an OBS act to describe the indication for use of a medication. Child concepts may be used to describe types of indication. Discussion: In prior releases, the code "SUGG" (suggests) was expressed as "an inversion of the reason link." That code has been retired in favor of the inversion indicator that is an attribute of ActRelationship.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''BLOCK'''
 
|'''BLOCK'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> blocks
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] blocks
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: The source act is performed to block the effects of the target act. This act relationship should be used when describing near miss type incidents where potential harm could have occurred, but the action described in the source act blocked the potential harmful effects of the incident actually occurring.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: The source act is performed to block the effects of the target act. This act relationship should be used when describing near miss type incidents where potential harm could have occurred, but the action described in the source act blocked the potential harmful effects of the incident actually occurring.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''DIAG'''
 
|'''DIAG'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> diagnoses
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] diagnoses
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to help establish the presence of a (an adverse) situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to help establish the presence of a (an adverse) situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-S
 
|3-S
 
|'''IMM'''
 
|'''IMM'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> immunization against
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] immunization against
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intented to provide immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease)</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intented to provide immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease)</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''ACTIMM'''
 
|'''ACTIMM'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> active immunization against
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] active immunization against
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to provide active immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease)</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to provide active immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease)</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''PASSIMM'''
 
|'''PASSIMM'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> passive immunization against
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] passive immunization against
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to provide passive immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease).</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to provide passive immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease).</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-S
 
|3-S
 
|'''MITGT'''
 
|'''MITGT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> mitigates
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] mitigates
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source act removes or lessens the occurrence or effect of the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>The source act removes or lessens the occurrence or effect of the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''RCVY'''
 
|'''RCVY'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> recovers
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] recovers
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: The source act is performed to recover from the effects of the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Definition: The source act is performed to recover from the effects of the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-L
 
|3-L
 
|'''PRYLX'''
 
|'''PRYLX'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> prophylaxis of
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] prophylaxis of
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to reduce the risk of of an adverse situation to emerge as described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to reduce the risk of of an adverse situation to emerge as described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3-S
 
|3-S
 
|'''TREAT'''
 
|'''TREAT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> treats
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] treats
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to improve a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to improve a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''ADJUNCT'''
 
|'''ADJUNCT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> adjunctive treatment
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] adjunctive treatment
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to offer an additional treatment for the management or cure of a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature. It is not a requirement that the non-adjunctive treatment is explicitly specified.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to offer an additional treatment for the management or cure of a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature. It is not a requirement that the non-adjunctive treatment is explicitly specified.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''MTREAT'''
 
|'''MTREAT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> maintenance treatment
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] maintenance treatment
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to provide long term maintenance improvement or management of a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to provide long term maintenance improvement or management of a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''PALLTREAT'''
 
|'''PALLTREAT'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> palliates
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] palliates
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to provide palliation for the effects of the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intended to provide palliation for the effects of the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4-L
 
|4-L
 
|'''SYMP'''
 
|'''SYMP'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> symptomatic relief
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] symptomatic relief
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intented to provide symptomatic relief for the effects of the target act.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>Description: The source act is intented to provide symptomatic relief for the effects of the target act.</p>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2-L
 
|2-L
 
|'''TRIG'''
 
|'''TRIG'''
|<font color="grey">(en-US)</font> has trigger
+
|[[Datei:EN-US.png]] has trigger
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A pre-condition that if true should result in the source Act being executed. The target is in typically in criterion mood. When reported after the fact (i.e. the criterion has been met) it may be in Event mood. A delay between the trigger and the triggered action can be specified. Discussion: This includes the concept of a required act for a service or financial instrument such as an insurance plan or policy. In such cases, the trigger is the occurrence of a specific condition such as coverage limits being exceeded.</p>
 
| colspan="2" |<p>A pre-condition that if true should result in the source Act being executed. The target is in typically in criterion mood. When reported after the fact (i.e. the criterion has been met) it may be in Event mood. A delay between the trigger and the triggered action can be specified. Discussion: This includes the concept of a required act for a service or financial instrument such as an insurance plan or policy. In such cases, the trigger is the occurrence of a specific condition such as coverage limits being exceeded.</p>
 +
|}

Aktuelle Version vom 18. November 2012, 13:16 Uhr

Codesystem Name Codesystem Id Version / Eingangsdatum Status
ActRelationshipType 2.16.840.1.113883.5.1002 2012-07-24 definitiv
Level/Typ Code Anzeigename Beschreibung
0-S ART EN-US.png act relationship type

Description: A directed association between a source Act and a target Act. Usage Note: This code should never be transmitted in an instance as the value of ActRelationship.typeCode (attribute)

1-S COMP EN-US.png has component

A collection of sub-services as steps or subtasks performed for the source service. Services may be performed sequentially or concurrently.

2-L ARR EN-US.png arrival

The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source Act entered into the source Act by means of the target Transportation act.

2-L CTRLV EN-US.png has control variable

A relationship from an Act to a Control Variable. For example, if a Device makes an Observation, this relates the Observation to its Control Variables documenting the device's settings that influenced the observation.

2-L DEP EN-US.png departure

The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source Act departed from the source Act by means of the target Transportation act.

1-S OUTC EN-US.png has outcome

An observation that should follow or does actually follow as a result or consequence of a condition or action (sometimes called "post-conditional".) Target must be an observation as a goal, risk or any criterion. For complex outcomes a conjunction attribute (AND, OR, XOR) can be used. An outcome link is often inverted to describe an outcome assessment.

2-L GOAL EN-US.png has goal

A goal that one defines given a patient's health condition. Subsequently planned actions aim to meet that goal. Source is an observation or condition node, target must be an observation in goal mood.

2-L RISK EN-US.png has risk

A noteworthy undesired outcome of a patient's condition that is either likely enough to become an issue or is less likely but dangerous enough to be addressed.

2-A _ActRelationsipObjective EN-US.png Act Relationsip Objective

The target act is a desired outcome of the source act. Source is any act (typically an intervention). Target must be an observation in criterion mood.

3-L OBJC EN-US.png has continuing objective

A desired state that a service action aims to maintain. E.g., keep systolic blood pressure between 90 and 110 mm Hg. Source is an intervention service. Target must be an observation in criterion mood.

3-L OBJF EN-US.png has final objective

A desired outcome that a service action aims to meet finally. Source is any service (typically an intervention). Target must be an observation in criterion mood.

1-S PERT EN-US.png has pertinent information

This is a very unspecific relationship from one item of clinical information to another. It does not judge about the role the pertinent information plays.

2-L AUTH EN-US.png authorized by

A relationship in which the target act authorizes or certifies the source act.

2-L CAUS EN-US.png is etiology for

Description: An assertion that an act was the cause of another act.This is stronger and more specific than the support link. The source (cause) is typically an observation, but may be any act, while the target may be any act. Examples: a growth of Staphylococcus aureus may be considered the cause of an abscess contamination of the infusion bag was deemed to be the cause of the infection that the patient experienced lack of staff on the shift was deemed to be a supporting factor (proximal factor) causing the patient safety incident where the patient fell out of bed because the bed-sides had not been put up which caused the night patient to fall out of bed

2-L COVBY EN-US.png covered by

A relationship in which the source act is covered by or is under the authority of a target act. A financial instrument such as an Invoice Element is covered by one or more specific instances of an Insurance Policy.

2-L DRIV EN-US.png is derived from

Associates a derived Act with its input parameters. E.G., an anion-gap observation can be associated as being derived from given sodium-, (potassium-,), chloride-, and bicarbonate-observations. The narrative content (Act.text) of a source act is wholly machine-derived from the collection of target acts.

2-L ELNK EN-US.png episodeLink

Expresses an association that links two instances of the same act over time, indicating that the instance are part of the same episode, e.g. linking two condition nodes for episode of illness; linking two encounters for episode of encounter.

2-L EVID EN-US.png provides evidence for

Indicates that the target Act provides evidence in support of the action represented by the source Act. The target is not a 'reason' for the source act, but rather gives supporting information on why the source act is an appropriate course of action. Possible targets might be clinical trial results, journal articles, similar successful therapies, etc. Rationale: Provides a mechanism for conveying clinical justification for non-approved or otherwise non-traditional therapies.

2-L EXACBY EN-US.png exacerbated by

Description:The source act is aggravated by the target act. (Example "chest pain" EXACBY "exercise")

2-L EXPL EN-US.png has explanation

This is the inversion of support. Used to indicate that a given observation is explained by another observation or condition.

2-L ITEMSLOC EN-US.png items located

Items located

2-L LIMIT EN-US.png limited by

A relationship that limits or restricts the source act by the elements of the target act. For example, an authorization may be limited by a financial amount (up to $500). Target Act must be in EVN.CRIT mood.

2-L META EN-US.png has metadata

Definition: Indicates that the attributes and associations of the target act provide metadata (for example, identifiers, authorship, etc.) for the source act. Constraint: Source act must have the Act.isCriterion attribute set to true. Target act must be an Act with a moodCode of EVN.

2-L MFST EN-US.png is manifestation of

An assertion that a new observation may be the manifestation of another existing observation or action. This assumption is attributed to the same actor who asserts the manifestation. This is stronger and more specific than an inverted support link. For example, an agitated appearance can be asserted to be the manifestation (effect) of a known hyperthyroxia. This expresses that one might not have realized a symptom if it would not be a common manifestation of a known condition. The target (cause) may be any service, while the source (manifestation) must be an observation.

2-L NAME EN-US.png assigns name

Used to assign a "name" to a condition thread. Source is a condition node, target can be any service.

2-L PREV EN-US.png has previous instance

A relationship in which the target act is a predecessor instance to the source act. Generally each of these instances is similar, but no identical. In healthcare coverage it is used to link a claim item to a previous claim item that might have claimed for the same set of services.

2-S REFR EN-US.png refers to

A relationship in which the target act is referred to by the source act. This permits a simple reference relationship that distinguishes between the referent and the referee.

3-L USE EN-US.png uses

Indicates that the source act makes use of (or will make use of) the information content of the target act. UsageNotes: A usage relationship only makes sense if the target act is authored and occurs independently of the source act. Otherwise a simpler relationship such as COMP would be appropriate. Rationale: There is a need when defining a clinical trial protocol to indicate that the protocol makes use of other protocol or treatment specifications. This is stronger than the assertion of "references". References may exist without usage, and in a clinical trial protocol is common to assert both: what other specifications does this trial use and what other specifications does it merely reference.

2-L REFV EN-US.png has reference values

Reference ranges are essentially descriptors of a class of result values assumed to be "normal", "abnormal", or "critical." Those can vary by sex, age, or any other criterion. Source and target are observations, the target is in criterion mood. This link type can act as a trigger in case of alarms being triggered by critical results.

2-L RELVBY EN-US.png relieved by

Description:The source act is wholly or partially alleviated by the target act. (Example "chest pain" RELVBY "sublingual nitroglycerin administration")

2-S SPRT EN-US.png has support

Used to indicate that an existing service is suggesting evidence for a new observation. The assumption of support is attributed to the same actor who asserts the observation. Source must be an observation, target may be any service (e.g., to indicate a status post).

3-L SPRTBND EN-US.png has bounded support

A specialization of "has support" (SPRT), used to relate a secondary observation to a Region of Interest on a multidimensional observation, if the ROI specifies the true boundaries of the secondary observation as opposed to only marking the approximate area. For example, if the start and end of an ST elevation episode is visible in an EKG, this relation would indicate the ROI bounds the "ST elevation" observation -- the ROI defines the true beginning and ending of the episode. Conversely, if a ROI simply contains ST elevation, but it does not define the bounds (start and end) of the episode, the more general "has support" relation is used. Likewise, if a ROI on an image defines the true bounds of a "1st degree burn", the relation "has bounded support" is used; but if the ROI only points to the approximate area of the burn, the general "has support" relation is used.

2-L SUBJ EN-US.png has subject

Relates an Act to its subject Act that the first Act is primarily concerned with. Examples The first Act may be a ControlAct manipulating the subject Act The first act is a region of interest (ROI) that defines a region within the subject Act. The first act is a reporting or notification Act, that echos the subject Act for a specific new purpose. Constraints An Act may have multiple subject acts. Rationale The ActRelationshipType "has subject" is similar to the ParticipationType "subject", Acts that primarily operate on physical subjects use the Participation, those Acts that primarily operate on other Acts (other information) use the ActRelationship.

2-L SUMM EN-US.png summarized by

An act that contains summary values for a list or set of subordinate acts. For example, a summary of transactions for a particular accounting period.

2-A _ActClassTemporallyPertains EN-US.png ActClassTemporallyPertains

3-L DURING EN-US.png occurs during

A relationship in which the source act's effective time is wholly within the target act's effective time.

3-L OVERLAP EN-US.png overlaps with

A relationship in which the source act's effective time overlaps the target act's effective time in any way.

3-A _ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsEnd EN-US.png ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsEnd

A relationship that defines the relative time of the end source act based on the time of the target act.

4-L EAE EN-US.png ends after end of

A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act ends.

4-S EAS EN-US.png ends after start of

A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act starts.

5-L EDU EN-US.png ends during

A relationship in which the source act ends between the start and end of the target act.

4-L EBE EN-US.png ends before end

The source Act ends after the end of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne EBE ActTwo", it means that ActOne ends before the end of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).

4-L EBS EN-US.png ends before start of

A relationship in which the source act ends before the target act starts.

4-S ECW EN-US.png ends concurrent with

A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends with the end of the target act's effective time.

5-L CONCURRENT EN-US.png concurrent with

A relationship in which the source act's effective time is the same as the target act's effective time.

4-L ECWS EN-US.png ends concurrent with start

The source Act ends when the target act starts (i.e. if we say "ActOne ECWS ActTwo", it means that ActOne ends when ActTwo starts, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).

4-L SBE EN-US.png starts before end

The source Act starts after the end of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne SBE ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts before the end of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).

4-L SCWE EN-US.png starts concurrent with end

The source Act starts when the target act ends (i.e. if we say "ActOne SCWE ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts when ActTwo ends, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).

3-A _ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsStart EN-US.png ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsStart

A relationship that defines the relative time of the start source act based on the time of the target act.

4-L SAE EN-US.png starts after end of

A relationship in which the source act starts after the target act ends.

4-S SAS EN-US.png starts after start of

The source Act starts after the start of the target Act (i.e. if we say "ActOne SAS ActTwo", it means that ActOne starts after the start of ActTwo, therefore ActOne is the source and ActTwo is the target).

5-L SDU EN-US.png starts during

A relationship in which the source act begins between the start and end of the target act.

4-L SBS EN-US.png starts before start of

A relationship in which the source act begins before the target act begins.

4-S SCW EN-US.png starts concurrent with

A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts with the start of the target act's effective time.

5-L CONCURRENT EN-US.png concurrent with

A relationship in which the source act's effective time is the same as the target act's effective time.

2-A _ActRelationshipAccounting EN-US.png ActRelationshipAccounting

Codes that describe the relationship between an Act and a financial instrument such as a financial transaction, account or invoice element.

3-A _ActRelationshipCostTracking EN-US.png ActRelationshipCostTracking

Expresses values for describing the relationship relationship between an InvoiceElement or InvoiceElementGroup and a billable act.

4-L CHRG EN-US.png has charge

A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a charge to a clinical act (source). A clinical act may have a charge associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the charge (bill) for delivery or performance of the service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs an organization to perform or deliver a service or product.

4-L COST EN-US.png has cost

A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a cost to a clinical act (source). A clinical act may have an inherit cost associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the cost of delivery or performance of the service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs an organization to perform or deliver a service or product.

3-A _ActRelationshipPosting EN-US.png ActRelationshipPosting

Expresses values for describing the relationship between a FinancialTransaction and an Account.

4-L CREDIT EN-US.png has credit

A credit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A credit, once applied (posted), may have either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account credit will decrease the account balance. A non-asset account credit will decrease the account balance.

4-L DEBIT EN-US.png has debit

A debit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A debit, once applied (posted), may have either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account debit will increase the account balance. A non-asset account debit will decrease the account balance.

1-S SEQL EN-US.png is sequel

An act relationship indicating that the source act follows the target act. The source act should in principle represent the same kind of act as the target. Source and target need not have the same mood code (mood will often differ). The target of a sequel is called antecedent. Examples for sequel relationships are: revision, transformation, derivation from a prototype (as a specialization is a derivation of a generalization), followup, realization, instantiation.

2-L APND EN-US.png is appendage

An addendum (source) to an existing service object (target), containing supplemental information. The addendum is itself an original service object linked to the supplemented service object. The supplemented service object remains in place and its content and status are unaltered.

2-L BSLN EN-US.png has baseline

Indicates that the target observation(s) provide an initial reference for the source observation or observation group. UsageConstraints: Both source and target must be Observations or specializations thereof.

2-L COMPLY EN-US.png complies with

Description:The source act complies with, adheres to, conforms to, or is permissible under (in whole or in part) the policy, contract, agreement, law, conformance criteria, certification guidelines or requirement conveyed by the target act. Examples for compliance relationships are: audits of adherence with a security policy, certificate of conformance to system certification requirements, or consent directive in compliance with or permissible under a privacy policy.

2-L DOC EN-US.png documents

The source act documents the target act.

2-S FLFS EN-US.png fulfills

The source act fulfills (in whole or in part) the target act. Source act must be in a mood equal or more actual than the target act.

3-L OCCR EN-US.png occurrence

The source act is a single occurrence of a repeatable target act. The source and target act can be in any mood on the "completion track" but the source act must be as far as or further along the track than the target act (i.e., the occurrence of an intent can be an event but not vice versa).

3-L OREF EN-US.png references order

Relates either an appointment request or an appointment to the order for the service being scheduled.

3-L SCH EN-US.png schedules request

Associates a specific time (and associated resources) with a scheduling request or other intent.

2-L GEN EN-US.png has generalization

The generalization relationship can be used to express categorical knowledge about services (e.g., amilorid, triamterene, and spironolactone have the common generalization potassium sparing diuretic).

2-L GEVL EN-US.png evaluates (goal)

A goal-evaluation links an observation (intent or actual) to a goal to indicate that the observation evaluates the goal. Given the goal and the observation, a "goal distance" (e.g., goal to observation) can be "calculated" and need not be sent explicitly.

2-L INST EN-US.png instantiates (master)

Used to capture the link between a potential service ("master" or plan) and an actual service, where the actual service instantiates the potential service. The instantiation may override the master's defaults.

2-L MOD EN-US.png modifies

Definition: Used to link a newer version or 'snapshot' of a business object (source) to an older version or 'snapshot' of the same business object (target). Usage:The identifier of the Act should be the same for both source and target. If the identifiers are distinct, RPLC should be used instead. Name from source to target = "modifiesPrior" Name from target to source = "modifiesByNew"

2-L MTCH EN-US.png matches (trigger)

A trigger-match links an actual service (e.g., an observation or procedure that took place) with a service in criterion mood. For example if the trigger is "observation of pain" and pain is actually observed, and if that pain-observation caused the trigger to fire, that pain-observation can be linked with the trigger.

2-L OPTN EN-US.png has option

A relationship between a source Act that provides more detailed properties to the target Act. The source act thus is a specialization of the target act, but instead of mentioning all the inherited properties it only mentions new property bindings or refinements. The typical use case is to specify certain alternative variants of one kind of Act. The priorityNumber attribute is used to weigh refinements as preferred over other alternative refinements. Example: several routing options for a drug are specified as one SubstanceAdministration for the general treatment with attached refinements for the various routing options.

2-L RCHAL EN-US.png re-challenge

Description:A relationship in which the target act is carried out to determine whether an effect attributed to the source act can be recreated.

2-L REV EN-US.png reverses

A relationship between a source Act that seeks to reverse or undo the action of the prior target Act. Example: A posted financial transaction (e.g., a debit transaction) was applied in error and must be reversed (e.g., by a credit transaction) the credit transaction is identified as an undo (or reversal) of the prior target transaction. Constraints: the "completion track" mood of the target Act must be equally or more "actual" than the source act. I.e., when the target act is EVN the source act can be EVN, or any INT. If the target act is INT, the source act can be INT.

2-L RPLC EN-US.png replaces

A replacement source act replaces an existing target act. The state of the target act being replaced becomes obselete, but the act is typically still retained in the system for historical reference. The source and target must be of the same type.

2-L SUCC EN-US.png succeeds

Definition: A new act that carries forward the intention of the original act, but does not completely replace it. The status of the predecessor act must be 'completed'. The original act is the target act and the successor is the source act.

2-L UPDT EN-US.png updates (condition)

A condition thread relationship specifically links condition nodes together to form a condition thread. The source is the new condition node and the target links to the most recent node of the existing condition thread.

2-S XCRPT EN-US.png Excerpts

The source is an excerpt from the target.

3-L VRXCRPT EN-US.png Excerpt verbatim

The source is a direct quote from the target.

2-L XFRM EN-US.png transformation

Used when the target Act is a transformation of the source Act. (For instance, used to show that a CDA document is a transformation of a DICOM SR document.)

1-L VALUE EN-US.png has value

Description:Indicates that the target Act represents the result of the source observation Act. FormalConstraint: Source Act must be an Observation or specialization there-of. Source Act must not have the value attribute specified UsageNote: This relationship allows the result of an observation to be fully expressed as RIM acts as opposed to being embedded in the value attribute. For example, sending a Document act as the result of an imaging observation, sending a list of Procedures and/or other acts as the result of a medical history observation. The valueNegationInd attribute on the source Act has the same semantics of "negated finding" when it applies to the target of a VALUE ActRelationship as it does to the value attribute. On the other hand, if the ActRelationship.negationInd is true for a VALUE ActRelationship, that means the specified observation does not have the indicated value but does not imply a negated finding. Because the semantics are extremely close, it is recommended that Observation.valueNegationInd be used, not ActRelationship.negationInd. OpenIssue: The implications of negationInd on ActRelationship and the valueNegationind on Observation.

1-A _ActRelationshipConditional EN-US.png ActRelationshipConditional

Specifies under what circumstances (target Act) the source-Act may, must, must not or has occurred

2-L CIND EN-US.png has contra-indication

A contraindication is just a negation of a reason, i.e. it gives a condition under which the action is not to be done. Both, source and target can be any kind of service; target service is in criterion mood. How the strength of a contraindication is expressed (e.g., relative, absolute) is left as an open issue. The priorityNumber attribute could be used.

2-L PRCN EN-US.png has pre-condition

A requirement to be true before a service is performed. The target can be any service in criterion mood. For multiple pre-conditions a conjunction attribute (AND, OR, XOR) is applicable.

2-S RSON EN-US.png has reason

Description: The reason or rationale for a service. A reason link is weaker than a trigger, it only suggests that some service may be or might have been a reason for some action, but not that this reason requires/required the action to be taken. Also, as opposed to the trigger, there is no strong timely relation between the reason and the action. As well as providing various types of information about the rationale for a service, the RSON act relationship is routinely used between a SBADM act and an OBS act to describe the indication for use of a medication. Child concepts may be used to describe types of indication. Discussion: In prior releases, the code "SUGG" (suggests) was expressed as "an inversion of the reason link." That code has been retired in favor of the inversion indicator that is an attribute of ActRelationship.

3-L BLOCK EN-US.png blocks

Definition: The source act is performed to block the effects of the target act. This act relationship should be used when describing near miss type incidents where potential harm could have occurred, but the action described in the source act blocked the potential harmful effects of the incident actually occurring.

3-L DIAG EN-US.png diagnoses

Description: The source act is intended to help establish the presence of a (an adverse) situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.

3-S IMM EN-US.png immunization against

Description: The source act is intented to provide immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease)

4-L ACTIMM EN-US.png active immunization against

Description: The source act is intended to provide active immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease)

4-L PASSIMM EN-US.png passive immunization against

Description: The source act is intended to provide passive immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease).

3-S MITGT EN-US.png mitigates

The source act removes or lessens the occurrence or effect of the target act.

4-L RCVY EN-US.png recovers

Definition: The source act is performed to recover from the effects of the target act.

3-L PRYLX EN-US.png prophylaxis of

Description: The source act is intended to reduce the risk of of an adverse situation to emerge as described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.

3-S TREAT EN-US.png treats

Description: The source act is intended to improve a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.

4-L ADJUNCT EN-US.png adjunctive treatment

Description: The source act is intended to offer an additional treatment for the management or cure of a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature. It is not a requirement that the non-adjunctive treatment is explicitly specified.

4-L MTREAT EN-US.png maintenance treatment

Description: The source act is intended to provide long term maintenance improvement or management of a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature.

4-L PALLTREAT EN-US.png palliates

Description: The source act is intended to provide palliation for the effects of the target act.

4-L SYMP EN-US.png symptomatic relief

Description: The source act is intented to provide symptomatic relief for the effects of the target act.

2-L TRIG EN-US.png has trigger

A pre-condition that if true should result in the source Act being executed. The target is in typically in criterion mood. When reported after the fact (i.e. the criterion has been met) it may be in Event mood. A delay between the trigger and the triggered action can be specified. Discussion: This includes the concept of a required act for a service or financial instrument such as an insurance plan or policy. In such cases, the trigger is the occurrence of a specific condition such as coverage limits being exceeded.